Who and How Will Be Punished by the Kremlin: the Second Is the “Belarusian” Front

Continuing the series of articles about the political and economic situation in a number of countries through the prism of formation and existence of threats to their statehood from the Russian Federation, experts of the Independent Analytical Center for Geopolitical Studies “Borysfen Intel” offer the readers a brief analysis of the domestic and foreign policy of Belarus.

A feature of the current development of the situation in the Republic of Belarus is President Alexander Lukashenko’s demonstration of “liberal” movements, both in the domestic and in foreign policy (his demonstrative activity in the Minsk dialogue to resolve the situation in the East of Ukraine and in relations with the European Union). This, according to the Administration of the Belarusian President, is supposed to restore his electoral rating, which fell due to the deterioration of the situation in the Belarusian economy, and to formally legitimize in the eyes of the West his upcoming victory in the presidential elections (November 2015) in case if the opposition boycotts them.

According to experts, today there is virtually no alternative to A. Lukashenko among the candidates for the presidency. The total level of support (confidence) by the population is quite high (47-49 %) as compared to that of the main leaders of the opposition (V. Neklyayev, M. Statkevych, A. Milinkevych, A. Lebedko, S. Kalyakin) and the total rating of democratic forces (up to 16 %).

The administration and political system of government built by the Belarusian President allows him to pay sufficient attention to strengthening his foreign policy positions. First of all, we mean the fact that A. Lukashenko uses the process of the Minsk political Agreements as a sort of “protection letter” in the complicated relationship with the West. It allows him both, to take independent steps /make independent statements/ and to “play” on the contradictions between the parties, involved in resolving the Russian-Ukrainian crisis.

From this point of view, the President of Belarus benefits if the Minsk process lasts for as long as possible. After all, it draws attention to both Belarus and to him personally. At the same time, we believe that A. Lukashenko is not going to openly argue with Russia — one of the key players in the crisis (all the statements of the Belarusian leader, called anti-Russian by the general public and expert circles, in fact are well balanced, orchestrated statements not contradicting the interests of the Russian Federation).

Besides, the President of Belarus seeks to demonstrate “independence” within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) in order to maximize economic benefits (cheap energy carriers, lifting of all restrictions and obstacles for Belarusian goods on the Russian market, obtaining substantial income from the re-export of European goods into the Russian Federation) as well as lever of pressure on Moscow.

At the same time, the Belarusian leader demands from the government to constantly defend state interests in cooperation, especially in trade, both with the West and the East, while promising to personally monitor the process in order to avoid an imbalance between Russian and European vectors. We do not exclude also that A. Lukashenko thus intends to promote cooperation between the EAEU and the European Union, because at this stage Brussels considers him, despite the sanctions imposed on him, a more convenient partner for dialogue than V. Putin.

In such circumstances, the official Minsk is trying to impose on Western partners its own terms of regulation of relations, outlining the range of issues on which the Belarusian side is ready to go to acceptable compromises. In particular, within the framework of the dialogue with the EU and the United States, Lukashenko offers for negotiations issues such as getting financial and political assistance in case of strengthening of Russian pressure on Belarus and Russia’s interference in its affairs; observance of human rights (conditions of release of political prisoners) actually without real steps to change the internal political climate in the country; providing Minsk’s political support for Ukraine; increasing the participation of the Republic of Belarus in the EU’s “Eastern Partnership” initiative.

The retired Ambassador of Ukraine Mikhail YezheIn general, the European Union, having experience with A. Lukashenko is trying to be pragmatic in its approaches to operational resumption of cooperation with Belarus, expecting its real steps towards the partial liberalization of the political and economic systems. The official Minsk considers that the invitation to participate in the “Eastern Partnership” Riga Summit suggests the warming of relations with the European Union due to Minsk’s active mediation in the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. By the way, demonstrating the “change in the attitudes of the official Minsk”, the Foreign Ministry of the Republic of Belarus hinted to the retired Ambassador of Ukraine Mikhail Yezhel, that he should not ask for political asylum in Belarus.

At the same time the fact that A. Lukashenko supported the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine, demonstrated his willingness to develop good-neighborly relations with our country, as well as reduced pressure on the Belarusian opposition is not considered by the European Union sufficient grounds to recover its full-fledged dialogue/cooperation with Minsk. The doubts about the Belarusian President’s “sincerity” that had some member-countries and institutions of the EU have been confirmed at the Riga Summit. Because Belarus, as well as the “faithful” to Moscow, Armenia, refused to sign the Declaration of the Summit, which contains the wording of the Russian aggression and the annexation of the Crimea. This suggests that there is a rationale for the Kremlin’s blocking of Minsk’s drift towards the EU.

In particular, Moscow can threaten the presidential prospects of the current leader of Belarus with measures to destroy stability in the country — the main ideological basis of the Belarusian authorities — inspiring “repetition of the events of 2010” with the help of powerful information, political and economic pressure, spreading information about the readiness to replace A. Lukashenko with a more suitable for the Russian Federation candidate, financing and inciting part of the opposition to mass protests.

The Kremlin believes that the Belarusian President will be more agreeable when already at the end of the first half of this year in Belarus socio-economic problems will worsen, first of all because of the negative trends in the Russian consumer market and low world oil prices, the reduction of foreign exchange reserves (since the beginning of the year — by 9.9 %), growth of the domestic debt by 14 % and giving up the practice of state support for the bankrupt state-owned enterprises (45 vs. 19 last year).

As show the corrected in April 2015 the IMF’s forecasts, this year Belarus’ GDP is expected to fall by 2.3 % and inflation will be 22.1 %. On March 31, 2015 in the Republic of Belarus, the moratorium on raising prices and tariffs was completely cancelled. Belarusian authorities deliberately reduce the domestic demand by using “inflation-devaluation” mechanisms to correct errors in state governing.

The dynamics of the gross debt of the government of Belarus in 2004-2017, in % to GDP
(actual and polynomial trend)
http://businessforecast.by/partners/ratings/488

By the way, Moscow is well aware that positive results in the “electorally important” agricultural sector and a positive trade balance of Belarus are largely provided thanks to increase in the supply of food products to Russia as well as Belarus’ playing the role of economic intermediary in terms of a sanction confrontation between Moscow and the West.

Belarus has created real conditions for re-export to Russia of banned Western products. Besides, in the country, especially in the free economic zones with the preferential tax regime there can be seen an active registration of Russian companies trying in such a way to avoid international sanctions.

Enterprises of the Russian Federation, whose dependence on Western imports is critical, register their own structures in Belarus, trying to use them to acquire the necessary components and accessories. The Russian military-industrial complex is provided with the imported electronic-component base through Belarusian organizations’ re-export of Western products. The main supplier of the component base in the Russian Federation is traditionally the Minsk JSC “Integral”, exporting integrated micro circuitries, semiconductor devices and other electronics not only of its own production but also those bought in the EU and the United States. In particular, under the guise of Belarusian goods, in Russia are sold (with a substantial margin) products of well-known Western electronics manufacturers such as Honeywell, Ramtron, Atmel, IDT, TI, HOLT, Dallas Semiconductor, Actel, Aeroflex Circuit Technology, Cypress Semiconductor Corporation. The main consumers are Russian companies that are directly subject to international sanctions, in particular, the JSC “KBP named after Academician A. Shipunov” (Tula).

At the same time, enterprises of the military-industrial complex of Belarus (except for a number of agencies — “Minsk Wheeled Tractor Plant”, “Peleng”, “Agat” and “Integral”), which in 2014 produced up to 15 % of the components for the Russian MIC, this year will not receive the expected orders from Russia and will be able to count only on indirect participation or subcontracting in the Russian Federation’s defense industry. In general, Moscow’s measures for protection of its own strategic enterprises may lead to the fact that Belarus will not be able to participate in the program of import substitution in the industry, and it will have to leave the Russian market of public procurement, which is estimated at 7 trillion rubles.

Do not forget also about Belarusian oil refining industry’s exports’ significant (at least 30 %) dependence on supply of raw materials and customs tariff “whims” of the state machine and oil monopolies of the Russian Federation.

The concept of the EurAsEC’s integration development

A. Lukashenko’s being interested in getting external financial assistance from the EurAsEC Anti-Crisis Fund (in March an application was sent for a loan to support the stabilization program for the years 2015-2017) and the Russian Federation (the Belarusian authorities have asked the Russian government for 2.5 billion US dollars in financial aid for 2015). At this, the Kremlin may use the Belarusian side’s failure to fulfill its obligations to the anti-crisis fund of the Eurasian Economic Union (Belarus in 2014 was accused of violating the 10 indicators of the credit program, included the five control ones) and the IMF’s strict conditions (structural reforms, liberalization of the exchange course, increase in tariffs for housing, communal services and transport, privatization /of state banks included/, reduction in inflation and “freezing” of salaries) in order to demand more concessions from Minsk in political and economic spheres, including possibility of selling certain leading Belarusian enterprises to the Russian side.

Financial and economic difficulties that have arisen in Russia for some reasons have considerably reduced its attractiveness in cooperation. In such circumstances, Belarus is trying to establish cooperation with other countries, including for the sake of both, getting loans and diversification of sales markets. Thus, during the three-day (May 10-12, 2015) state visit of the leader of the PRC Xi Jinping to Belarus, almost 20 bilateral agreements and memoranda were signed, providing for Belarus almost 7 billion US dollars (about 3 billion US dollars from this sum will be given by Beijing as low-interest loans and up to 4 billion US dollars Belarusian banks will get to finance commercial infrastructure projects involving the Chinese side). According to A. Lukashenko, Belarus will assist China in promoting its interests in the European Union and in the Eurasian Economic Union.

Thus, A. Lukashenko is trying to get the maximum dividends from strengthening of the Russian Federation’s political, economic and information pressure, demonstrating to the Belarusian population his ability to hold a diversified foreign policy strategy, in the western direction included.

The state propaganda in Belarus is persuading pro-European Belarusian electorate (20 %), Roman Catholics by religion (12 %) and the Polish minority (3.2 %) that, taking into consideration the aggressive promotion by a significant part of the Russian political elite of ideas of the “Russian world”, only the acting leader of the country is the guarantor of the independence, sovereignty, preservation of identity of the Belarusian nation and inter-religious peace in the country. Leading Belarusian media and the authorities continue to take care of strengthening the image of A. Lukashenko as a peacemaker and mediator in the negotiation process to resolve the conflict in the East of Ukraine, a strong, wise and decisive leader of the state, able to effectively defend national interests, prevent the political and economic instability of Belarus due to the deterioration of the foreign economic and security situation (the RF-West conflict, the crisis in the Russian Federation’s economy).

With the approach of the presidential elections in Belarus, the Belarusian authorities will use the security policy and the economic situation in Ukraine to emphasize the stability of their own state and its peaceful role in the region. In this context, the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and the Russian Federation’s aggressive policy will be presented to the Belarusian society in such a way as to influence its national consciousness, to convince it of the need to defend the independence of the country, the importance of the development of the Belarusian language and culture as means of identity of the nation.

Minsk will not abandon the policy of balancing between Russia and the West, trying to deter Moscow’s initiative to introduce a single currency, to buy the leading Belarusian enterprises, as well as to strengthen its military presence in the country. At the same time the Western countries, except for the United States, will refrain from taking action for the purpose of artificial loosening the situation inside Belarus, giving preference to the tactics of forming “a pro-European circle” from among the representatives of executive power and business elite, close to A. Lukashenko.

In relations with China, Lukashenko will develop bilateral cooperation, mainly in order to maintain an alternative channel for obtaining loans and diversifying the market for selling Belarusian products, trying to play the role of a bridge between the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union.

Схожі публікації