22.05.2015. The “Round Table” of the Center “Borysfen Intel”

On the 22nd of May 2015, at the “round table” of the Independent Analytical Center for Geopolitical Studies “Borysfen Intel” there gathered together the President and CEO of the Analytical Center “INGEPO Consulting Company” Corneliu Pivariu, President of the Fund of Veterans of the Military Intelligence Service of Ukraine, Major-General Yuriy Levchenko, Chairman of the Ukrainian Legal Community, social activist Oleh Bereziuk, Vice-President of “Borysfen Intel” Yuriy Radkovets, Director for Editorial Policy and Public Relations of the Center Oleh Makhno, analysts and experts of “Borysfen Intel”.

The subjects to discuss and the range of issues were determined in the opening speech of Vice-President of “Borysfen Intel” Yuriy Radkovets. He also told the audience about the main directions and features of the Center’s analytical work in the current situation.

– Today we are actually engaged in studying and development of principles of the Ukrainian geopolitics, forming approaches for the formation of the Ukrainian geopolitical school, studying Ukraine’s role and place in the world, European and regional (included in the post Soviet space) geopolitics, estimating and warning about possible challenges and threats to Ukraine’s national security, appearance of which is explained by real changes in the current security environment, including those caused by the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.

We, the participants of the “round table” want to openly share with our Romanian guest our views and assessments on the present; to hear how he interprets current developments and prospects of the security situation around Ukraine; to learn if he agrees with summing-ups that appear in printed and electronic Ukrainian media, in particular, with those of “Borysfen Intel.”

– I have got the impression that Ukraine as a state is not taken seriously by any serious geopolitical players, – Yuriy Levchenko expressed his point of view at the beginning of the conversation. – I have travelled a lot around the world, representing our country and its Armed Forces. And when told that I came from Ukraine, people would ask me: where is it located, this Ukraine of yours? And in the USA (laughs) once my white skin made them wonder as they believed that I came from the African continent … I would say that since that time, little has changed. Today an important event is taking place in Riga (the Summit of the “Eastern Partnership”), which will determine the future direction of the three post-Soviet countries. And it hurts me to hear, how they are going to cooperate with us soon — they report about this somewhat reluctantly, as if giving us a sop, “Okay, we will not refuse to deal with you, but …” And all this is perceived here today as a great political victory.

Not detailing, I will say that we will take us more than a decade to have solved our problems. But pay attention, all our external problems are closely linked to our internal ones. Firstly, we see that military operations continue. We call it diplomatically “anti-terrorist operation” against the separatists. But we all are well aware that this is a war! And we are not at war with uneducated miners, but with the powerful neighboring country — Russia! Could we imagine that a few years ago? Citizens still do not want to believe it … We are aware that this problem cannot be solved straight off. Even if the war somehow stops, the relationship between the Ukrainian and Russian peoples is spoiled for a long time. By the way, despite Germany’s once having been our great enemy, today we are in good relations with German citizens. We think of them as of close to us in spirit, in the views on the situation, as of normal partners and neighbors. Believe me, the age-mate of our victory in the Second World War, that more than half of our lives people of my generation had lived in hatred towards Nazis, which was transferred to Germans. And now life has somehow developed so that it is difficult to even explain why so. This perception now “corresponds” not to Germany, but to Russia! In Russia the attitude to Ukraine is worse than that in Ukraine to Russia. Putin’s propaganda is doing its dirty work!

Secondly, I want to say that we somehow much harder free ourselves from the shackles of the past, than do other former Soviet countries. In our country still there is a struggle between the two systems, which interferes with our normal development. Today we have three enemies: the external enemy — Russia, the internal enemy — the contradiction between the Soviet and post-Soviet reality, and the third enemy — corruption. According to international data, Ukraine ranks sixth in the world in terms of corruption, being so to speak, “among the leaders.” And it “envies” Croatia, heading the list. And against such a background we live.

Thirdly, I, as the head of our veterans’ organization, am very sensitive to this situation. Including to the attitude of the veterans. Some tectonic displacement must have happened in the minds of our politicians, because they have opposed the historical heritage, the position of veterans who put their lives on the altar of their country. This is a long story, but I will mention only the following: due to the fact that we are a very young country (and I believe that the first stirrings of the statehood of Ukraine appeared only in 2004, and got firmly established only last year), we still need to do a lot. The territory cannot be a country only because it is called one. The country should be built, and ours so far resembles Babylon. We are facing a lot of problems, apart from resolving which we also need to build our state. Therefore, with the hope for a better future, for our friends-neigbours’ full support, I hope that we will cope with this task.

O. Bereziuk:

– Yuriy Tymofiyovych spoke on the urgent problems accompanying the process of quite a complicated formation of our state. And it’s true. If nothing else, because Ukraine is located in the heart of Europe, where the interests of many countries intersect. That’s why its formation is influenced by both friendly and hostile attitudes to it. The neighboring Russian Federation’s policy is aimed at Ukraine’s statehood’s failure. Russia is well aware that without Ukraine, it will not create its empire. And the current Russian President’s policy, supported by up to 80 % of Russians, is aimed at the revival of the Russian Empire. We, Ukrainians, must make every effort to defend our Ukraine’s independence. Otherwise we will not be able to win the “unannounced” to us Russian war. The military know that it cannot be won without true allies. We hope that our European neighbors are our natural allies in this confronting Russia’s neo-imperial ambitions.

Speaking about the European Union, it is appropriate to mention my yesterday’s meeting with representatives of France — members of Nicolas Sarkozy’s party the “Union for a Popular Movement” — where they rather skeptically spoke about the prospects of the EU. It is frustrating to hear such things from Europeans. However, taking into consideration our relations with western neighbors, particularly with Romania, we state that European countries that have common interests and similar problems should solve them together, countering external threats included. Regardless of the position of the EU member states, and of the fact that Ukraine is not its member yet.

Naturally, due to the geographical location of our two countries, we have to do with the same problems. I think that the promising idea of ​​establishing a regional military Baltic-Black Sea Union is very timely for us. We have consulted with some politicians of the Baltic countries and Georgia. The Georgian President supports the idea. Mr. Margvelashvili spoke about this in front of all the people and that caused the Russian special services’ immediate reaction. It turns out that we hit the “bull’s eye”. Russian special services tried to discredit the Georgian President, using agents of influence, their influence on the media. And the fact that Russia is against such an alliance, confirms that we have to work very hard on its creation. By and large, we know that it is sink or swim.

… Yes, Russia wants to become an empire. Whether Putin remains in power or not, the Russia’s policy in the nearest future will be aimed at its imperial renaissance. Social studies confirm that more than 85 % of the Russian population support exactly this Putin’s idea. If Putin does not take into account the aspirations of the Russian people, he will not be the Russian President. That’s what we should remember and, accordingly, be ready to defend our national interests that are significantly different from the interests of the Russian people. In this situation, Romania is our natural ally, especially if we take into consideration the historical experience of our relations. This refers to the period when Ukraine was a relatively independent part of the Moscow state — in the times of Hetmans Khmelnytsky and Mazepa, and that positive experience when we were defending our national interests together. I believe that we do have the cooperation prospects.

O. Makhno:

– I would like to ask our guest from Romania: what, do you think, is characteristic of our society at the moment, when it is in a state of war, but aspires to live, professing European values? What does it dream of? You can answer, based on the just heard in the speeches of my colleagues, but I’ll add what you’re unlikely to say: our society has a certain political naivety. Because, unfortunately, it believes that all problems can be solved very simply. Suffice it to adopt some law, to vote for some document, to sign some deal with somebody — and the state will prosper. Let’s leaf through the pages of our Ukrainian history, and there we will find proof that Ukraine more than once had been betrayed in its motion for statehood. Due to this political naivety included. It was so after the First World War, during and after the Second World War, and something similar can be observed today, in the present situation, when we hear that the world is beginning to get tired of Ukrainian problems. So, the independence of the Ukrainian state is in the hands of its citizens, who should not be naive. Do you all agree with this statement? I will not insist that you do.

World media often claim that we have an unleashed civil war. Why civil? Because the responsibility for solving this problem in the East of Ukraine can be allocated to Ukraine. Without thinking about the consequences and forcing Ukraine to please all the so-called geopolitical players.

As for our European integration, visa-free regime, and so on, which we have already mentioned at the beginning of our conversation, I dare say this: intellectually honest Ukrainian citizens are not so much dreaming of the EU as are trying to avoid the possibility of once again fighting Europe, as it was, for example, during World War II. After all, if Russia today manages to revive the empire within the former borders, where is the guarantee that it will not mobilize under its flags Ukrainians for its military campaign against Europe? Hypothetically, it is not difficult to imagine a situation when Russia has attached us to itself and then announced the call-out into its army … Europe obviously does not want to realize this…

Yu. Radkovets:

– Yes, this is the right assumption, if we bear in mind the fact that in the annexed Crimea, Russia is conscripting young people into its army, and in the DPR-LPR they are not just talking about the same call-out, but are trying to, as the saying goes, make a cottage industry out of it.

Yu. Levchenko:

– This is observed not only in the Crimea, or in the East of Ukraine. Even in the Russia itself military subpoena are given to movers from the Donbas or Luhansk region, who arrived there in search of ark of refuge.

O. Makhno:

-… And if this is spoken about here, then not loudly. And this version of events cannot be excluded. History has more than once repeated in such a form. Then why could it not repeat in it again? Or does Europe not think so? ..

This is probably better understood in the West of Ukraine, because the historical memory is fresher there. By the way, I remember the end of the 1980s, when there were serious protests in Romania. In the western regions of Ukraine they were perceived with great responsibility, preparing hospital rooms for hospitalization of possible victims. Thank God, then nothing happened. We would like Europe, in its turn, not to turn a blind eye to Ukraine’s problems. And one of the tasks of our Center is to analyze historical events, to remind about them. As the ancients used to say: all the future exists in the past. But the Ukrainians should not make a mistake, this is an unaffordable historical luxury for them.

C. Pivariu:

– I agree that mistakes should not be repeated, it is stupid.

Yu. Radkovets:

– We are grateful to Romania for the fact that it was one of the first countries to recognize the independence of our Ukrainian state, and one of the first countries to ratify the document on Association between Ukraine and EU. We are sure that in the future the people of Romania, the Romanian state will act as an advocate of Ukraine in Europe.

C. Pivariu:

– Thank you for having invited me to your Center and I would like to express my appreciation of communication with your specialists … Europe is important for Romania too. We need to talk about current events in your country, not only about those outside of your state. It is very important to meet with you in your land, to see with my own eyes how you live, to hear from you what you think, how you perceive your problems and how you are trying to solve them. Our Center is planning the next issue of “Geopolitical Pulse” devoted to the events in Ukraine. And we are interested in your giving us materials for this issue. By the way, our organizations are quite similar, and we are rightful counterparts. I see that you have announced a competition for students. We, too, in our time did it, striving to attract our youth to this sort of work. Unfortunately, we did not get the desired result. Perhaps young people (not all, but most) do not realize so far the importance of geopolitical studies.

I understand the situation in Ukraine very well. I think the most important thing for it is its economy, elimination of economic problems. You have quite a young state, and in order to build a strong nation in the conflict with Russia, you have to be united and improve the strength of your Army. And to eradicate corruption. By the way, once, visiting Ukraine for the first time, I was very surprised that in your shop I was not given receipts for the purchases, and sellers could not even understand what I demanded from them.

Romania’s at the international level is very important for Ukraine. It was recently mentioned in a meeting of our Presidents. The support, of course, in the context of the European Association. And if we talk about an advocate for Ukraine, I would say the following: Ukraine’s best advocate is Ukraine itself. Our actions, our results and achievements depend only on us. As you have already mentioned here: it is sink or swim.

It is clear that Russia has set itself imperialist goals. And here its actions, figuratively speaking, can be imagined as follows: someone once broke a window glass and has not been punished. Then someone else will break windowpanes, justifying his actions by the fact that the previous person got away with it! Here, as you know, we already speak about international law. No one seeks to use a complex approach to international Law…

Unfortunately, the geopolitical situation in Ukraine is very complicated. The other day I was looking through the analysis, written in London, where it is said that Ukraine could become the epicenter of global changes. I agree with this, because I pay attention to the study of other geopolitical centers, which have an impact on the countries’ positions on the issue of geopolitics regarding Ukraine.  One of such examples is the events in the Middle East. The Islamic State just yesterday seized Palmyra, and before that it had launched an airstrike against the Iraqi positions, despite the fact that the Coalition led by the United States on a regular basis responses with airstrikes. Despite the aviation strength of the Coalition, the Islamists cannot be overcome without  the ground military forces.

Yu. Levchenko:

– Everyone knows this axiom: unless a soldier has stepped on the territory with his boot, the territory cannot be considered won or won back.

C. Pivariu:

– Taking into consideration the “Arab spring of 2011,” in no way we can assume that some day it will become the Arab winter. It all began with sacrificing Syria … We must bear in mind that there are powerful geopolitical players in the world, on whom many events depend, and they are seeking to solve their own geopolitical whims. Putin’s aggression is serious enough, because it threatens the European dimension, established after World War II. And this is important, in particular, in the context of nuclear nonproliferation.

We remember that Russia did put its signature under the Budapest Agreements, thus guaranteeing Ukraine’s sovereignty. It ignores its obligations. And what arguments are we to give today, for example, to Iran, for it to give up the idea of becoming a nuclear state? The current global situation will have many serious consequences. It is a pity that in Ukraine, political forces cannot unite to defend their national interests. Despite the fact that the opportunities of Romania are not as big, we have to support you.

… The mention of the fact that Americans do not know geography, gives me great doubt. They know very well where Ukraine is situated.

Yu. Levchenko:

– But 75 percent of Americans do not know in what state they live!

O. Makhno:

– They live so well because they don’t know where they live.

C. Pivariu:

– At one time I also was very much surprised with Americans’  trying to learn more about the events in Ukraine. Such being interested is inherent in large nations.

Yu. Radkovets:

– Mr. Corneliu, let me ask your opinion about this: Americans understand that Russia can be helpful to them in resolving a number of problematic issues in the Middle East. I mean the Syrian issue, and the Iraqi issue and the Iranian one. After all, it has traditionally had a powerful influence in the region. Could it happen that in the US-Russian relations on the Middle East problems, Ukraine would be a subject to bargain?

C. Pivariu:

– You know, I thought about it. Based on recent data, it can be assumed that Russia’s position in the Middle East is rather weak. It has lost its influence on Iraq, Egypt, its naval base in Tartus has closed. It still has insignificant influence on Syria, because before 2011 there had been 11 thousand Russian military servicemen there. This is one of the reasons for Assad’s remaining in his post. We must remember that Iran has an influence on Russia. I do not think that Russia can be a major participant in the negotiations with the USA on the Middle East. Ukraine is a more serious problem than the Middle East.

Yu. Levchenko:

– We should not forget that, according to some unofficial data, Mr. Kerry and Mr. Putin at the recent meeting had a talk about Ukraine and Syria. Putin promised not to rush with delivery of С-300 complexes to Syria if the United States do not interfere deeply into Russian-Ukrainian relations.

C. Pivariu:

– I do not think Americans are that thoughtless — to agree to such a deal.

Yu. Radkovets:

– Mr. Corneliu, you once said that the powerful of the world do not write off the scenario of the “Second Yalta”,  “Second Potsdam.”

C. Pivariu:

– The situation in Ukraine, as we see, is constantly changing. And after that, we state that the United States remains a superpower. There are other countries that are trying to win over part of the world influence. And the result of the confrontation of these states is the current situation in Ukraine. It is said that the world cannot be bipolar, but I will say this: whatever the number of these “polars”, the international Law has to be respected at any time and under any circumstances. We should not fight, people should live in a normal, peaceful community.

Yu.  Levchenko:

– You know, I have an impression that history develops in a circle rather than spirally, as it is supposed to. And we are now back to the same point, in which we were in the middle of the last century, when the League of Nations collapsed, followed by the Second World War. Currently, the UN is beginning to acknowledge its powerlessness before global challenges, and this may show that  we are again on the brink of war — the Third World War. That is today’s “optimism.”

C. Pivariu:

– One very clever philosophical book reads that everything changes because nothing changes.

O. Bereziuk:

– You know, it looks like the Third World War has already begun. What Huntington mentioned in his theory of the clash of civilizations is happening now.

C. Pivariu:

– Yes, I’m familiar with his views. When I was studying in the United States, he was my teacher and signed that book of his to me.

Yu.Radkovets:

Summing up the results of today’s “round table” at the Independent Analytical Center for Geopolitical Studies “Borysfen Intel” themed: “Current issues of the security situation around Ukraine and ways of their solution”, I want to thank all the participants for taking part in its work and their own estimates of the development of current security issues around Ukraine, as well as proposals in the approaches to their  resolving.

I am sure that our further joint work in these spheres will contribute to both the search for solutions to these issues, and the formation of approaches to creating the school of Ukrainian geopolitics.

Схожі публікації