The draft law of the Government of Ukraine on reforming the Ukrainian GTS (providing for the transfer of control of 49% at 100% of its state ownership), apparently, is a tricky tactical action — a forced act, and the result of the Kremlin’s years long neo-imperial encroachments.
Firstly, the fact that the Cabinet of Ministers agrees to give 49% of the rights to manage the Ukrainian GTS to the USA and EC’s companies, is nothing else but a recognition of the fact that UKRAINIANS ON THEIR OWN ARE NOT ABLE to manage their gas transportation system under fair rules, established and being a matter of fact in Europe. Obviously, this is a necessary step, and it does not mean that Ukrainians do not know how to manage their own GTS — just the neighbor Russian Federation would not let us. Although this way (whether we like it or not) we give the Kremlin a «trump card», that is, the reason for the Kremlin in the future to say that Ukrainians are not able to decide anything, but says nothing at the same time that it is the Russian Federation who goes to great lengths not to let the Ukrainian GTS function normally.
Secondly, the transfer of 49% of the operator of the GTS to American and European companies is not a panacea and cannot in the future insure the GTS from Gazprom’s entering it. After all, the Russian Federation, for political purposes, would «pay the price» to buy up Western firms even with overpayment. If necessary — it will offer so much that Western business owners will not be able to refuse the offer. And no one in today’s legal West is able to prevent it. Russia has repeatedly proved that in such opaque schemes it is a strong player. The more so that Ukraine cannot convey honest information. At the moment, unfortunately, the Russian mentality set on international corruption, is difficult for the West to understand.
Besides, coordination with the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine of the list of foreign companies — is actually imposing on it not its functions: the Parliament, performing to a certain extent the functions of law enforcement bodies, has to determine the legitimacy of the actual (or POTENTIAL) commercial relations of Western firms with Gazprom. And this contradicts the current democratic law, and no Parliament (even the future one in Ukraine) would agree to it and is able to do it!
Thirdly, it would be wrong to say that the Ukrainian gas transportation system without transit will turn into «scrap metal». At least because the Ukrainian gas transportation system has a dual function: domestic gas supplies to Ukrainian consumers, and transit. On transit the NJSC «Naftogaz of Ukraine» earns 1.5 billion US dollars. At first glance, it’s a lot. Especially in the time of the present war. But it is not the amount that can compensate Ukraine problems over gas the neighboring Russia keeps creating. It is obvious that transit is more profitable than no transit (for example, Ukraine is better off without the «South Stream»). But there will be no tragedy in the opposite case, when there is no transit of Russian gas. Then there will be a problem which Ukraine will have to solve. A lot of countries do live without gas transit!
So, for Ukraine the best option would be to manage its own GTS independently. But under the circumstances, it is clear that the Government of Ukraine will have to make some sort of compromise between the strategic Ukrainian interest and a tactical benefit.
