Russia’s ”Hybrid Wars”. Are They a Fundamentally New Approach or a New Use of Old Technologies?

Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine is in the center of attention of Ukrainian and foreign politicians, experts and the media. At this, presenting, so to speak, the invoice information about events around the country, as well as the corresponding estimates and forecasts, the authors try to summarize and conceptually comprehend the Russian federation’s policy and steps at the present stage of history. In general, most experts believe that Russia is seeking a new way to implement its geopolitical plans to resume its leading role as an influential political center of the world-class power by waging “hybrid wars” with its rivals, opponents and enemies. The essence of this approach is the use of “soft power”, when an armed force is not used openly.

And this is true. Experts warn that this way Moscow is trying to hide its participation in the armed conflict in the East of Ukraine, to justify the annexation of the Crimea and thus to maintain its positions in the world and to achieve the abolition of Western sanctions. And to be sure to reduce the United States and Europe’s role as the main “blockers” of the Russian leadership’s neo-imperial policy. However, Russia’s methods of “hybrid warfare” cannot be considered something new either in Russia’s or in the world’s practice. They have been resorted to already for thousands of years, and their concept was clearly defined by the ancient Chinese ideologist of the art of war Sun Tzu, who claimed that “the best war is to destroy the enemy’s plans, then to break its alliances, and after that — to crush its army”.

Nowadays, these ideas were developed in the works of Western and Russian experts and political scientists, including Frank Hoffmann, Daniel Lasik, George Davis and Deviz Kilcullen (USA), Frank van Kappen (Netherlands), as well as O. Dugin (Russia).

In 2013, in fact before the Russian military aggression against Ukraine, the concept of modern “hybrid wars”, as one of the key directions of implementation of Russia’s state policy, it was set out in the report of the Chief of the General Staff of the Russian Federation’s Armed Forces Army General V. Gerasimov, “Major Trends of Development of Forms and Methods of Use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and Current Tasks of the Military Science to Improve Them”. The report was voiced at the general meeting of the Academy of Military Sciences, which was engaged exactly in generalization of the experience of such past wars and wars of modern history, including Russian ones. Let’s just skim through the history of Russia’s use of methods of “hybrid warfare” over the last century. In particular, it resorted to this practice during the civil war of 1917-1922. Trying to resume its control over the newly independent and separated from Russia after the October Revolution of 1917 states, it provoked pro-communist uprisings in their territories, and then proclaimed alternative authorities controlled by Moscow. Then these “authorities” “asked” for Russia’s assistance, and it rushed to defend “the working population, as well as the legally elected governments and councils from bourgeois nationalists”. And all this — against the background of active information campaigns to comprehensively ideologically discredit the ideas of national revival and democratic development.

This is exactly how Russia regained control of Ukraine, the Caucasus and Central Asia. Exactly in this way it wanted to take under its “wing” Poland, Finland and the Baltic countries. But, it faced a firm opposition of their patriotic leadership and a high level of national awareness of the local population.

Since 1923, after the Civil War, Russia has been “fond” of similar methods of “hybrid wars”, organizing communist revolutions in neighboring countries by implementing the plans for “world revolution” as a form of Bolshevik Kremlin’s dominance over neighboring regions, and in the future — over the whole world. Let us recall how Russia “clinged” to Germany (which was flooded with revolutionary sentiments due to the defeat of the Germans in World War I, and, consequently, ridden by political and economic collapse), and encroached on the countries of Central and Eastern Europe (where revolutionary tendencies were also observed) and the Balkans (the most unstable European region at that time). Supporting the left, pro-Russian, and in some cases openly extremist forces, throwing its numerous agents to them, spreading subversive revolutionary literature and forming armed militias, Moscow had been provoking internal conflicts and riots, to implement which it used the Comintern (the Communist International), the “bandolier” of which contained most of the communist (workers) parties of the time. They were the Kremlin Bolsheviks’ main striking force, putting into life the ideas of the ”world revolution”. But the question is: to what extent successful were those efforts? why were they successful only up to a certain time? The answer is simple — the Soviet Union did not have enough resources. That Union could not cope with countermeasures taken by the leading European countries, first of all by the United Kingdom and France. And only in the late 1930s, when the Soviet Union had become stronger, Moscow was able to partially realize its plans, annexing the Baltic states, Eastern Poland, Romania and Finland. And, please, note: again by using methods of “hybrid warfare”, supported by a demonstration, and in the case of Poland and Finland — a direct use of military force. Please note, because Moscow failed to achieve the desired within Sun Tzu’s first two postulates, it realized his third postulate, providing for the defeat of the enemy’s troops.

 

… And then World War II Broke out

But Russia was not alone in using “hybrid warfare”. Let’s recall some resonant events of recent years, in particular, revolutions and the armed conflicts in North Africa, the Middle East and the former Soviet Union. The main creators of international politics, to achieve their geopolitical goals did not use classical military aggression, but instead, they resorted to such covert actions, which are usually used in the political, economic, information, and special spheres. At the initial stage of their use, the armed forces fulfill only certain tasks (transport blockade of the enemy, strikes at the most important objects, and so on). The essence of such actions is not the physical destruction of the enemy within the framework of a large-scale war, but including it into the aggressor’s sphere of influence, or liquidation as a state (disintegration) by means of the so-called “soft power”.

During “hybrid wars”, led by both, Russia and other countries, the attackers resort to aggression without a formal declaration of war; conceal their participation in the conflict; widely use irregular armed formations (including under cover of the civilian population); disregard international norms of warfare and the existing agreements and arrangements; resort to mutual actions of political and economic pressure (formally preserving relations between the two countries); conduct active propaganda and counter-propaganda, using “dirty” technologies; fight in the cyberspace.

That is what the United States, the EU, Israel and their partners had resorted to, putting pressure on Iran over its nuclear program. Recall the political and economic sanctions against Iran, support for opposition forces’ protests against the official government, cyber attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities, “sudden” death of the leading nuclear scientists, demonstration of military force and the threat to use it. Iran was forced to concede to its opponents, fulfilling the UN Security Council and the IAEA’s requirements to ensure international monitoring of Iran’s nuclear program and to stop uranium enrichment to weapons-grade level.

But we know a lot of facts, when it all ends in the armed confrontation. For example, Russia’s direct military aggression against Georgia in 2008 and the “Unified Protector” international military operation in Libya, in 2001.

Today Russia is using the same actions in its war against Ukraine — “hybrid” in form and “asymmetric” in content, as “logical” continuation of its “hybrid policy” towards Ukraine. Moscow began this war the moment Ukraine had gained independence, trying to get our country back under the Kremlin’s influence. Of course, the methods of this war differ from the methods of the 1920s . But only in regard to information technologies and the fact that Moscow has replaced communist ideology with the Russian-chauvinist one in the context of implementation of its plans to build “Russian world” and integration of the Eurasian space.

But here Russia failed to achieve the desired using the “hybrid war” or hidden actions of its troops in the Crimea and the Donbas. Therefore, it is preparing for large-scale use of military force, as it once did against Poland, Finland and Georgia. The Russians are deploying a powerful grouping of troops numbering 100 thousand military servicemen near the eastern border of Ukraine under the guise of strategic command and staff exercises “Caucasus-2016”. That is, Moscow is following Sun Tzu’s third postulate.

 

What Next — the Third World War?

As you can see, the forms and methods of a “hybrid war” in historical terms are always relevant, and Russia uses them against Ukraine, but at this, conditions and instruments for their implementation change, due both to the emergence of new technologies, and to the significantly wider range of methods of implementing them. In this context, it would be more correct be to speak of “hybrid wars” as the “wars of the new generation” as stressed in his researches by President of the American Foundation “Potomac” Dr. Phillip Karber. At this, “hybrid wars” are closely connected with the use of armed force and in many cases they turn into a direct armed confrontation between the parties.

So, speaking of “hybrid wars”, there is no point to try to “rediscover America” or to “reinvent the wheel”. We should proceed from the existing experience of the use of forms and methods of such wars by Russia or other countries, taking into consideration really new approaches. Then publications, estimates and forecasts on the subject will be truly scientific and of real practical value.

 

www.reliablecounter.com

Схожі публікації