Chief of the Defence Intelligence of Ukraine talks about how often he speaks with the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, whether the DIU is “patronized” by the Secretariat of the President, and whether Crimea could go through the “Kosovo syndrome”.
Dear Victor Ivanovych! Let us congratulate you on the upcoming holiday and on the occasion of your promotion to Major General on the eve of the Independence Day. By the way, does your promotion somehow affect your service?
Thank you for the compliments. Speaking of the effect… the rank on the one hand and the trust on behalf of nation’s top authorities on the other hand – altogether mean huge responsibility and push to self-improvement.
You have become the fifth chief of Ukraine’s Defence Intelligence after Olexandr Skipalski, Igor Smeshko, Victor Paliy, and Olexandr Halaka. And you have declared that you were ready to make it effective, efficient, patriotic, and hi-tech. What have you been able to achieve so far?
The Defence Intelligence – at every stage of its evolution – was headed by a person needed at that very time. So I did not come to an empty space. Today’s DIU owes my predecessors for being a self-sufficient, fine-tuned, well-functioning, and respected agency. My task is to bring it to a totally new level enabling it to cover the whole range of threats that exist in the world today.
And to be more specific?
Further development of DIU’s entire system is aimed at raising the efficiency of intelligence-gathering, analytical work. I would like to point out several aspects. Let’s say, improvement of the agency’s technical capabilities, its space component in particular. In this respect our work contributes to both MoD, General Staff and the Foreign Ministry, Ministry of Emergency as well as other departments.
Could you give any examples?
Our satellite images were used for monitoring of the situation around damaged vessels in the Black Sea and for conducting relief operations. Most recently, our space intelligence performed fine during the rescue operation aimed at bringing home Ukrainian sailors from Leman Timber captured by Somali pirates. Your newspaper wrote about the incident.
What resolution did those images have?
About 70 centimetres. People, their movements, small vessels circulating between Leman Timber and shore – everything is very legible. By the way, our people were on staff of the multiagency taskforce created for this particular crisis management. They contributed to the crisis settlement which is known to have ended with safe, bloodless hostage extraction…
What else did the new DIU chief manage to achieve?
Steps have been taken in order to optimize the organizational structure, to attract young promising specialists in order to guarantee maximum output and effective functioning of the entire defence intelligence system, from its tactical to strategic elements. I will not go into details, but there’s a lot that’s being done.
“Segodnya” wrote about the 7 possible war scenarios around Ukraine. What can you tell about them?
Just as many more could be added to those seven, if desired. Unfortunately, there are more than enough threats and challenges around our country whether of a war, military, political, terrorist, ecological, or industrial nature… the important thing is being able to foresee them, to soberly evaluate them, and to work in order to prevent them. This is something common for both intelligence and reporters.
What drags the defence intelligence down?
The major limiting factor is insufficient financing. You know, intelligence means advanced technology, high-precision equipment. Another reason for the inability to quickly raise efficiency is low salaries. To say more, the money was not even always paid on time. We have managed to somewhat improve the things; otherwise unique specialists would have started leaving. Some of those who speak several foreign languages, skilled in the information technologies, hi-end analysts. Anyone of them could easily find a civilian job with such employment benefits that no military even dreams of – houses, sanatorium-resort therapy. The MoD leadership realized that fact and supported the DIU. Finally, I would like to mention one more interference factor. They try to drag us into politics, into some sort of intrigues. Well, obviously somebody is not feeling comfortable if we simply do our job and show no reaction to somebody’s insults, accusations…
You mean DIU’s involvement in the accusations on behalf of the Secretariat of the President against the Prime Minister? Public announcements of Yulia Tymoshenko’s treason, political corruption were allegedly triggered by your analytical memo sent to the Secretariat. Is that true?
I can understand people’s curiosity about the defence intelligence as a closed agency and the job it does. But I will refrain from discussion that could advertise for somebody. I’ll put it briefly: no matter how hard someone tries to overblow a political scandal involving the defence intelligence, we will not let that happen. The dogs bark, but the caravan goes on. DIU stays out of politics. Period.
Let’s touch upon a different subject then. How often do you meet with the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, i.e. the President? Who else consumes DIU’s information?
Our information, analytical files that cover the issues of global and regional military and political situation development are laid on President’s desk every day. By the way, it was the head of state who suggested that DIU be headed by a military. Those matters that demand immediate response on behalf of the country’s top decision-makers are notified of instantly. This assumes oral reporting, too. MoD, GS, CNSDU, Secretariat, and the Cabinet are informed within the limits of their authority. Other ministries, departments are notified within the co-operation framework in the procedure prescribed by law.
You used to work in the Secretariat of the President before coming to the DIU. Are you feeling “patronized” by the Secretariat and particularly by its chief, Victor Baloga? What kind of relationship, besides work-related, do the two of you have?
I did work in the Secretariat of the President, and not only under Victor Baloga. That work significantly extended my horizons provided me with experience. The relationship is normal, formal which enables effective performance of the tasks set before my agency by the President and the Supreme Commander-in-Chief. There’s no “patronizing” which obviously means attempts to subdue the defence intelligence, the way you have put it.
Were the August events in Caucasus surprising for our defence intelligence? What kind of analytical, operating data was flowing to Ukrainian decision-makers on the eve of the Georgia-Ossetia conflict?
We constantly monitor the situation in those regions where Ukrainian peacekeeping personnel is deployed, and we inform the top government authorities of any changes. There are five Ukrainian officers in Georgia who perform their duties under the UN mission. Therefore, since we were analyzing the situation in the indicated problem region, we projected its aggravation. The information was real-time. I believe it was quite useful for determining our President’s position.
Judging from those projections, was DIU prepared for Russia’s tough position in the conflict?
In our judgements and projections concerning the situation development in Caucasus we try to take into account every factor and condition that could influence the process. This includes the Russian factor, too.
In terms of the data that our defence intelligence has, who was the first to start shooting in Tskhinvali?
Judging from our data, the shooting was continuous in the region recently. We know that Georgia fired the first gun as an answer to provocations and in order to put end to them. Who was the first one to provoke is usually difficult to determine, besides, it is not remembered in History. I could give endless number of examples of the so-called frozen conflicts or those that still continue or have ended recently – Vucovar, Serbska Kraina, Mostar, Gorazda, Bendery, Tiraspol, Nagorny Karabakh, Darfur etc. The initial shot is fired whether from a hunting rifle of from an artillery system. But that’s not the point. Unless the world community changes its mind and finds a universal formula for a modern security system, most of the named conflicts could cause far more tragic consequences.
Is the Russian Black Sea Fleet a point of interest for the DIU?
We do not conduct domestic intelligence.
But the Russian warships leave Sevastopol every now and then. They did so most recently, heading for the Georgian coast!
Ukraine has enough special and other agencies that monitor the situation around the Black Sea Fleet. This is a subject for a separate discussion.
As a person who served in Balkans, don’t you think that after Abkhazia and South Ossetia, the Russians who had won the independence could bring the “Kosovo syndrome” to Transnistria, and further on perhaps to Crimea?
I don’t believe that the scenarios of Abkhazia, South Ossetia could recur in the regions you have mentioned. As a party in the negotiation process, Ukraine declares its readiness to pursue solely peaceful solution of the disputes. And speaking of Crimea, there are absolutely no signs of conflict region form the military point of view. Debates around the territorial quality of the republic recur periodically due to actions of back-alley politicians, imprudent press releases…
Are DIU employees decorated on certain occasions or for their particular merits?
Defence intelligence operatives are awarded for particular achievements, performance of special tasks. Some of them are awarded under classified Presidential decrees, others – under fake names…
How unjust!
The time has not come yet. Only after many years people will learn what were these officers awarded for. If they ever do…
FROM CADET TO DEFENCE INTELLIGENCE CHIEF. Victor Hvozd was born May 24, 1959 in Ternopol region. He has diplomas of Kyiv Higher Combined Arms Command School, Lviv University faculty of law, Master’s degree from Kyiv University of Economics and Law. He is a regular intelligence officer. Starting from 1981, Victor Hvozd served in various command, staff positions. Participated in the UN peacekeeping operations in former Yugoslavia. Served as Ukrainian Defence attaché in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, as deputy chief of the MoD Department of military diplomacy, and as Ukrainian MoD representative under Ukraine’s permanent mission in the UN, N.Y. Also served in the Security Service of Ukraine, Foreign Intelligence Service. Worked in the Secretariat of the President. Holds the post of the DIU Chief since January, 2008. Married. Has two children. Speaks five languages. Fond of tennis, photography.
“Segodnya” newspaper, September 5, 2008
