After February 15, 2016 the EU lifted its sanctions against 170 high and close to A. Lukashenko Belarusian officials and 10 companies, some experts, including Belarusian ones, have stated, “Belarus is with Europe again”. Some argue that “Minsk without sanctions is like advance payment without guarantees”, believing that Brussels’ cancelling the “black list” for the official Minsk — is letting the Belarusian authorities go on using cooperation with the EU to its discretion and in its own interests.
Who is right? What is Belarus’ real situation against the background of “friendly” quarterly (16 October and 15 December 2015, February 5 this year) meetings of “Batka” (Father) with V. Putin? How will the economic situation in the country make the Belarusian authorities maneuver between Moscow and Brussels? What are the benefits/dividends and threats to A. Lukashenko and the Belarusian society from the use of the Minsk negotiation platform? We’ll try and answer these and other questions in our political-economic review.
Despite the fact that in Belarus the political situation remains “stable”, internal and external challenges to A. Lukashenko’s administration do not decrease, and first of all, those from Russia. This (apart from the well-known desire to “rule forever”), as well as the forthcoming parliamentary election campaign (autumn of this year) make the Belarusian leader keep a certain distance in supporting Russia’s actions against Ukraine, the Russian military operation in Syria, and the Russian-Turkish confrontation.
During the latest Sochi meeting of Heads of the “two-headed Union State”, President of the Republic of Belarus managed to reach an agreement with Russia on certain financial concessions (possibly on restructuring of Belarus’ debt to Russia and the Eurasian Fund for Stabilization and Development), having not given in on the issue of deployment of a Russian air base in the territory of Belarus, and to resolve the conflict situation with the supply of petroleum products.
But the Kremlin still continues to link the issue of giving Belarus a loan with Minsk’s agreeing to the deployment of a Russian air base, that at the moment is unacceptable to A. Lukashenko. The President of the Republic of Belarus is fully aware that the deployment of this military object of the Russian Federation’s Armed Forces would eliminate the prospect of the resumption of cooperation with the West, including the ability to obtain a loan from the IMF, the final lifting of sanctions by the EU and the USA, and “benefits” from using the negotiation platform in Minsk to stop the war in the Donbas.
The government circles and business elite of Belarus are more and more worried about the fact that V. Putin by Russia’s aggressive actions against Ukraine actually is destroying the system of formal and informal guarantees and preferences based on “special friendly” bilateral relations with Russia. The official Minsk notices both, strengthening of the rhetoric of supporters of a “hard line” in V. Putin’s environment (including the feasibility of activating the so-called “process of revival of the empire” on the cost of Belarus) and the presence of the Kremlin lobbyists and supporters in law enforcement bodies of the Republic of Belarus and in opposition forces. Undoubtedly, in order to destabilize the situation in the neighboring country, Moscow may use the powerful presence of Russian banks in the banking system of this country. In particular, it is believed that the confrontation between the part of A. Lukashenko’s opponents in December 2010, and the powerful financial and economic crisis in Belarus in April-May 2011 were inspired by the Kremlin in order to block the possible development of the Western vector of foreign policy of the official Minsk and to make Belarus join the Customs Union.
Now, even the pro-governmental Belarusian experts recognize the large number of supporters of the so-called ideology of “Russian world” among the population of Belarus (at least 60 %). According to their estimates, most of the country’s citizens, regardless of their views would not resist the incorporation of Belarus into Russia, but would just try to get used to living “in a new way”. At this, representatives of the Belarusian law enforcement agencies in their majority are inclined to accept the “new order”, hoping for their salaries increase to the Russian level.
At the same time, Russian media are intensively “informing” the Russians and Belarusians on the alleged preparation in the territory of Ukraine and Poland (under the command of American instructors) of Belarusian radical right-wing nationalists with experience in combat operations in the Donbas, who are preparing to infiltrate into the territory of Belarus in order to destabilize the situation. This way the Russian Federation’s special services are trying to create an illusion of preparation/attempt of a radical upheaval in the neighboring Belarus and to prepare its “population” (taking into consideration the current wave of the great-power “jingoism” in the Russian Federation) for a possible “soft annexation” of Belarus, like the occupation of the Crimea.
Prediction of the possibility of such a course of events forces A. Lukashenko’s environment to make preparations for “revolutionary”, “hybrid” and other scenarios, up to the reviewing the Military Doctrine of Belarus. In particular, in the nearest future they are going to provide for the consideration of the Parliament of the country a new edition of the Doctrine, which, compared to the current document, contains a clear definition of actions of foreign states on the preparation/inspiration of “color revolutions”, creation of mechanism for overthrowing undesirable political regimes with the help of force, changing the constitutional order and violation of the territorial integrity of other countries by provoking internal armed conflicts. The main focus will be on “hybrid methods and means of the use of military force”, as well as on the need to take into consideration “mechanisms for organizing color revolutions” (Ukraine), the events of the “Arab Spring” (Syria) and interdependence between external military threats and internal contradictions.
In the same context, the political leadership of Belarus at the informal level is actively pursuing the idea of neutralization of the state with legislative recognition of its neutral status at the UN level. The aim is, first of all, to obtain, as a neutral state, additional foreign dividends during the Russian aggression against Ukraine, not to allow the change of venue for the negotiations (it is planned to create in Minsk a Regional Centre of the United Nations for preventive diplomacy in Eastern Europe) and to use the “UN umbrella” for international support in the situation of the predicted intensification of the Russian pressure.
Besides, A. Lukashenko has offered schematic models, allowing Western businesses to reduce their financial costs because of the acting international sanctions against the Russian Federation and Russian counter-sanctions. Over the past year Belarus has become a significant intermediary for the supply of western products to the Russian market, including high-tech ones, so badly needed by the Russian economy. President of Belarus also offers Western partners regional schematic models of cooperation and infrastructure projects in energy industry, logistics (loading ports of the Baltic States), and independent from the Russian Federation transport corridors (“North-South”), co-operation in the military-industrial complex and so on.
At the same time it is possible that such diplomatic maneuvers of the Belarusian leadership may lead to emerging in the future of a situation where the West and Russia will bring to Minsk conflicting demands, concerning, on the one hand, the RB’s leaving the CSTO, the revision of the anti-Western Military Doctrine of the state and independence of the Belarusian Army from the Russian Federation as the prerequisites for the recognition of the neutral status of Belarus, on the other — guarantees for the RB’s remaining in the sphere of exclusive influence of the Kremlin with the threat to implement the scenario of “Anschluss”.
At the same time, the EU and USA realize that a rapid democratization of Belarus is not possible because the modernization declared by the Belarusian government will be taking place within the framework of the existing authoritarian system, and because the majority of the population is not interested in democratic reforms. Consequently, Brussels and Washington will stick to the policy of gradual involving of Minsk into the orbit of their interests, “encouraging” A. Lukashenko with promises to help in obtaining the IMF’s loan, and at this stage, not going beyond demanding systematic reforms.
Taking into consideration the impossibility of the official recognition of the inefficiency and even wrongness of Belarus’ economic model, developed in previous years on the principles of strict state regulation, A. Lukashenko in late January of this year announced the decision to continue the current economic policy, instructing the government to prepare new proposals for its improvement and promotion its effectiveness in modern conditions, “masking” so the actual implementation of reforms.
In case of development of the situation according to the pessimistic scenario, and the preservation of world oil prices at a significantly lower than the planned by the government level of 50 US dollars per barrel, this year the Belarusian budget options will have to be revised in the direction of public expenditure cuts (in 2016 oil revenue will be used to repayment of the national debt). The external public debt of Belarus (12.4 billion US dollars) as of the beginning of 2016, has reached 22.7 % of GDP, approaching the limiting value of economic security (25 %). Gold and foreign currency reserves, after the repayment of external and domestic liabilities, in foreign currency have decreased by 149 million US dollars and in early February this year, amounted to 4026. 8 million (in the equivalent, according to the IMF’s calculation scheme) or 4275.7 million (according to the national system of definitions).
Now the Belarusian leadership is negotiating with the IMF on a loan of 3 billion US dollars at 2.28 % for 10 years on the enlarged program — for structural reforms. It is assumed that Belarus will adhere to the recommendations of the Fund (at the moment differences are only in terms of their implementation). In particular, the country has seen some changes in accordance with the requirements of the IMF, namely the increase in tariffs for electricity and public utilities, transportation, gradually is growing the cost of manufactured goods, is being considered a possibility of raising the retirement age (the format of the appropriate explanatory work with the population is currently being worked out). With this in mind, Belarus has rather high chances to reach an agreement with the IMF (the final decision on that program is expected at the end of the first quarter of 2016).
Recently, they have also begun discussing the question of the resumption of comprehensive negotiations on the country’s accession to the WTO (earlier Minsk, at Moscow’s request, came out of the negotiation process).
Apart from the negative impact of external factors and problems of reforming, the economy of Belarus continues to experience the pressure of factors such as non-competitiveness of Belarusian industrial goods on foreign markets (except in some CIS countries), weakness of the current composition of the government, powerful bureaucracy and corruption of the officials at various levels, which can lead to failure/blockage of the structural changes.
That is why A. Lukashenko is forced to take certain steps to solve one of the biggest challenges on the path to economic reforms in the country — the staffing problem — namely, the lack of effective managers. Now Belarus has started the implementation of the “Bridge” program, which provides for organization and funding in 2016-2017 of 500 visits to the EU of 1500 Belarusian representatives of industrial, scientific, business and management structures for sharing experiences and establishing partnerships. Besides, Belarus has joined the Bologna Process, which, together with the introduction of relevant standards in the sphere of education and evaluation of knowledge should contribute to the establishment of scientific cooperation with the Western world.
Measures are being taken to reduce the funding of the public sector, and to strengthen control over its effectiveness. Since January 1, 2016, the only source of funding for state programs has become the Development Bank, which will provide resources on a competitive basis (assuming funding, primarily those areas that will ensure the development of the innovative capacity of the economy). In the country’s budget for 2016, almost 10 times reduced is the volume of concessional financing and subsidizing of enterprises. At this, unlike the previous programs of state support, the money must return within 1-2 years. A similar situation is observed in the agricultural sector, where preconditions have been created for formation of the land market (the country’s biggest resource in case of unpredictable events), and the former collective farms have been transformed into JSC.
The National Bank of Belarus has a strict policy on improvement of the financial market, giving up the “inflation-heating” of the economy (in the situation of a crisis the Government will try to keep inflation at the level of 12 %). The time terms of withdrawal of the licenses from troubled banks have been reduced to a few weeks. Within three months had been developed and implemented the system of “credit register” which, among other things, greatly complicates the possibility of fraudulent transactions in the credit sphere. Besides, the country will held a denomination of the Belarusian ruble from July 1, 2016. Banknotes issued in 2000, which are now in circulation, will be replaced with banknotes and coins issued in 2009, in a ratio of 10,000 to 1.
The National Statistical Office (“Belstat”) has been transferred to the new methodology of calculation of GDP, which is currently used in the EU, USA and Canada. In order to streamline securities transactions and to revive the stock market, a single portal of the financial market has been created. The country is also going to come from the directive system of planning to indicative planning (draft law is under consideration in the Belarusian Parliament), to create equal conditions of farming for the public and private sectors (in this context, is expected to be adopted the Law on Public-Private Partnership).
In turn, the Belarusian leadership has resorted to a series of measures aimed at reducing dependence on Russia in the most sensitive issues for the Belarusian economy (oil, gas, potash market, MTC). In particular, there is the establishment/expansion of cooperation between Belarus and Iraq (oil industry, defence industry), Qatar (MTC, construction), the United States (science and administrative sphere), the EU (trade, including petroleum products distribution), Turkmenistan (production of potash fertilizers /in the future/), as well as Ukraine and Turkey, despite these countries’ confrontational relations with Belarus’ main partner — Russia and the sanctions standoff with the West.
The new concept of energy security among other major measures (increase in generating capacity, diversification of suppliers and kinds of energy resources, development of renewable energy engineering, abandoning imports of electricity from 2017) provides for the private sector’s admission to the market. Besides, Minsk has decided to invest 150 million US dollars into Zimbabwe mining industry (gold, platinum, rare earth elements) that in the future can replace the relevant Russian supplies.
Taking into consideration the systemic actions of the Belarusian authorities to reduce economic dependence on the Russian Federation, A. Lukashenko, of course, counts on the West’s political support to the processes of reforming the country with a view to expanding the reforms for financial and investment spheres. In this context, indicative is the actual cancellation of the majority of the USA’s restrictions, as well as the EU’s sanctions against Belarus. This will help activate economic cooperation with Belarus and expand its access to Western financial resources and technologies.
So, the leadership of Belarus will stick to the policy of balancing between Russia and the West and a diversified foreign policy. At the same time, Minsk, in order to obtain political and economic bonuses from the EU and the USA, will try to fully take advantage of its neutral policy towards the confrontation between Russia and the West and the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.
In this context, A. Lukashenko’s regime hopes for its international partners’ support to finally get out of the “political isolation”, and to normalize its relations with the European Union and the United States, as well as for the West’s macro-financial assistance to overcome the recession and to level the destructive impact on the Belarusian economy of the unfavorable external environment and the situation in the Russian Federation.
So, Minsk is interested in cooperation with Ukraine, counting on lobbying Belarus’ interests in the West, additional opportunities in the development of trade and economic cooperation with foreign partners in terms of implementation by Ukraine of the Association Agreement with the EU. At the same time Belarus’ opportunities to develop strategic cooperation with Ukraine in the security sphere is limited by Minsk’s allied commitments to Russia.