“Tricky Moves” in Politics “a-la Russe”

Oleh Makhno

 

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov was planning to visit Turkey on November 25 for a working visit to participate in the 5th session of the Russian-Turkish joint group of strategic planning, operating (until recently) within the framework of the headed by the Presidents of the RF and Turkey High Level Cooperation Council. “First of all we will discuss the situation in Syria and the situation in the Middle East and North Africa in general” ​​- recently promised the official representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry. But because of the Russian aircraft downed by the Turkish, Moscow, as we know, cancelled the Russian Foreign Minister’s visit. This is understandable: what is there to discuss if the diplomatic angle of view of both sides has instantly changed under the influence of the controversial “emergency”?

Topics for discussion, without a doubt, had been prepared thoroughly, bearing in mind the remarks made two weeks ago by the Presidents of the two countries — Turkey and Russia. And now it is unlikely that Russian diplomatic circles will have to deal with them. The “Gordian knot” of Russian-Turkish problems (and with it the promising developments) was momentarily “cut” by an “air-air” missile, launched by a Turkish F-16 against the Russian military bomber. Into the political pique got, for example, economic questions of energy carriers and of fulfillment of bilateral agreements. Thus, Turkey will no longer be defrosting the Russian project for construction of the Akkuyu Nuclear power plant, which until recently “had prospects for resumption”. The Turkish Stream will not flow, despite all the Russians’ (“worrying” not so much about their own as about the Turkey’s difficult economic situation) hopes for the resumption of its work “imbued” not so much by their own as by the Turkey’s difficult economic situation. Russian analysts’ reports about Turkey’s supplies to Russia, including the Crimea, of thousands of tons of agricultural products, the Turks’ investing quite large sums into business projects also were pleasant to hear, especially when Russia guaranteed assistance in reducing customs duties.

In political terms — willy-nilly, but approaches have to be coordinated, and not only to the warring parties in Syria, but also, for example, to the events in Ukraine in general, and to the fate of the Crimean Tatars — in particular. Possibly they would have considered the current situation in the vastness of the Caucasus, in particular, the interests of the “Four” of Caspian states — Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan (recently mentioned in the analytical materials of “Borysfen Intel”). For example, Azerbaijan, along with Kazakhstan plans to deliver its gas to Europe through the gas pipeline laid through Turkey, while Russia fully controls the situation here with the gas and oil supplies, vigilantly watching its rivals, threatening its plans in Southern Europe, by the way, trying at this to take an advantage of the confrontation of some countries of the South Caucasus. Now these two countries (Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan) will have to decide the issue of supply. Not counting on Russia, which certainly is no assistant to its colleagues from the Eurasian Economic Union.

Presidents of Russia and Turkey
V. Putin and R. Erdogan
Ministers of Foreign Affairs
S. Lavrov and M. Cavusoglu

Undoubtedly, work of the Russian-Turkish High Level Cooperation Council will also be frozen (a regular meeting of which was appointed for December 15, 2015, as agreed at the bilateral meeting of Presidents of Russia and Turkey V. Putin and R. Erdogan in Antalya at the summit of G20 leaders). One more thing is worth mentioning: at that meeting were present both Minister of Foreign Affairs S. Lavrov and M. Cavusoglu, as well as the Turkish Energy Minister A. Riza Alaboyun and the head of the Turkish Intelligence Organization H. Fidan. That is, the range of duties of those present was eloquent of the content of the planned Russian-Turkish talks and about the theme and urgent issues requiring careful consideration or decision. No wonder that on the eve of S. Lavrov’s canceled trip, in the media there appeared a little message that some groups of local residents Cypriots were inviting the Russian military to “stay” in Cyprus. Allegedly, in order to protect the island from the militants of the ISIS, who were at a stone’s throw away from this popular with tycoons offshore zone. Now Cypriots will have to take care of their security without relying on the Russian Navy…

Turkish Energy Minister
A. Riza Alaboyun
The head of the Turkish Intelligence Organization
H. Fidan

Apparently, Russia was also planning to reach an understanding with Turkey as a NATO member, like before it had almost found a common language with another member of the Alliance — France which allegedly had agreed to rapprochement with the Russians under the pressure from terrorist actions of the IS. Understandably, France had been explaining this by a serious terrorist threat to the world community when allies are chosen regardless of ideological differences. But after the incident with the Russian plane, it will have to reduce its “zeal” in the rapprochement with Russia. And the Russians may already forget their dream about implementation of the idea of ​​loosening the solidity of the West by signing lucrative bilateral agreements, where Turkey was one of the first in the queue.

Here we must get distracted from the subject and pay attention to the following: by and large at the present time, we have witnessed a confrontation between the interests of Christian and Muslim worlds, despite the fact that the issue is being tactfully fomented about the spread of terrorism from the Middle East. Europe, in recent decades hosting immigrants from there, is careful in its actions and conclusions. It clearly sees the line, beyond which it will have to step in this confrontation, and its decisions are made in compliance with laws and in the future it firmly adheres to them. At least, it always tries to. In this aspect Europe is better off than Russia. Why? Because within it (except for secular Turkey) there are virtually no states or republics with Muslim populations, as it is observed in a certain way in the Russian Federation, and before — in the USSR. Let us recall the “ideological” battles over religion of Tatars, Chechens, Dagestanis, Ossetians, etc., or the so-called “Russian world” with its Orthodox faith, with its recent calls to defend and rescue around the world “brothers in faith” (including in Ukraine). What have the “ideologists” of Orthodoxy reached? The answer is obvious: they have sowed distrust among fellow believers, having opposed them to each other. Now Russia is trying to somehow “taxi out” from the political roadside on which it fell due to the economic sanctions of the civilized West. However, how correctly in relation to its partners, it is “taxiing” and how it is trying to do it — the RF’s political steps on the world stage show.

Here is a typical example, which at first sight has nothing to do with our topic.

October 16, 2015, in Kazakhstan, there was a regular meeting of the Council of Heads of States of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), where among the 17 main items on the agenda there was the issue of “strengthening security in the region, the fight against international terrorism, which today should be a priority in the activity of the countries that have to most effectively use the potential of the CIS anti-terrorist center”. External and internal reasons for terrorism were also voiced at the meeting. As external reasons they considered financing of certain groups and groupings of terrorist orientation. As domestic reasons were mentioned poverty, illiteracy, backwardness, radicalism, fundamentalism, social injustice. The meeting stated that if there are no such objective reasons in a country, then, despite any external forces’ attempts, it will be difficult to create a nurturing ground for terrorism there.

But why at the meeting of heads of the CIS countries they did not go further and did not explain what to do with individual countries of the CIS (Azerbaijan, Armenia), which for decades have been at swords’ points, spending money to purchase weapons for their armed forces, including from the Russian Federation? Could this not be considered “outside forces’ attempts”, spreading seedlings of terrorism in the South Caucasus?

As you know, at the meeting of the Council of the Heads of States of the CIS, among other things, the Council approved the candidacy of heads of security and intelligence services and the Coordinating Committee of Air Defense of the CIS countries.

And at this, the meeting decided on formation of a so-called joint integrated regional air defense system in the Caucasus region of collective security, the agreement on signing which, as instructed by Russian President, has to be prepared within this month. “To accept the offer of the government of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Armenia to establish a joint regional air defense system in the Caucasus region of collective security,” reads Moscow’s order. (Turkey, as Armenia’s neighbor, willy-nilly will have to react, for example, to strengthen its land and air borders, to closely monitor the movement of foreign military equipment, not let that military equipment into its territory from any direction, including from Syria, from which the Turkey’s border was violated and for that a Russian aircraft was accidentally downed).

Let’s also pay attention to the following: Azerbaijan which also took part in the aforementioned meeting, for a long time has had to buy arms and military equipment from the Russian Federation not only to curb the activity of the Armenian armed groups, but also to regain by force the Azerbaijani territory captured by Armenians. Last year the contract for the purchase of Russian weapons accounted for 3 billion US dollars. Azerbaijan remembers the up-to-date saying: if you want peace — prepare for war…

Armenia also gets the weapons and military equipment from the Russian Federation, and, as stated in some media, at low prices. The Foreign Minister of Armenia in an interview with BBC once even admitted: “We cooperate with Russia in the military sphere and therefore purchase and receive arms from it. Nothing new in that”. And because this purchasing is rather specific, because Armenia is paying Russia with the received from the same RF loans (couldn’t that be the money that Azerbaijan is paying for the purchased from Russia weapons?), then, according to the Azerbaijani analysts, Moscow in a certain way is responsible for Yerevan’s policy — in particular, and for unleashing in the future of regional hostilities — in general. And it is possible that it may fall under the concept of “terrorism”, to fight which Russia calls on the entire civilized world.

By the way, in the Armenian Gyumri there is dislocated the equipped with S-300 and MiGs notorious Russian 102nd Military Base, the period of Russia’s free staying there has been prolonged till 2044. And for that the RF has promised not to interfere with Armenia’s independent access to the political arena for the conclusion of bilateral agreements on cooperation with other countries, which fact, in the long run, does not suit Azerbaijan or Turkey or other countries of the Caspian region.

Hadn’t this question, among others, been planned to be discussed by Russian and Turkish diplomats at the meeting which was not held? And if it had been planned, then under what angle? Not at the expanse of CIS countries which are forced to politely move in the wake of Russian politics and repeat its stunning tricks (“tricky moves”) only in order not to irritate the “big brother”?

There is no need to go far for an answer. Let’s look at some of the facts mentioned at the same meeting of the heads of the CIS countries. The trade turnover between the CIS countries has fallen, many national currencies have lost their power because payments are in dollars and it statistically results in a minus. V. Putin’s idea to create a common “currency” is also not acceptable for the independent countries of the CIS, as their economic independence would be out of the question then. The idea of payments in national currencies does not work either, as the conditions of economic development of countries are far too different. Because, for example, Azerbaijan, rich in oil and gas, is fully able to independently conduct its business in international markets, creating its own model of economic development.

Kazakhstan has quite a large potential. Both these neighboring countries are actively looking for new forms of cooperation in the economic sphere, have the opportunity to actively resist the world crisis. For example, last summer they welcomed the first container train from China, confirming the opening of the East-West corridor, which, according to I. Aliyev, “…is of great geopolitical importance and will provide an opportunity for closer integration of the countries situated along this path as well as of those located nearby”. The Caspian neighbor- countries are interested in the implementation of the project on making the North-South corridor to connect to Iran, with which there are certain agreements to accelerate the process of uniting railway lines, promising to be the shortest route to connect the huge markets of China, India, Iran, Azerbaijan and Europe, in particular, Turkey.

And I wonder what Russia would have offered Turkey in December at presidential meeting (that never happened) of Erdogan and Putin to establish economic relations, and whether it would have taken into consideration the interests of its CIS fellows, for example, those voiced by President Aliyev at the recent G20 summit in Turkey? Given the current political developments and the role which Russia is trying to play in them, it is too early for member countries of the Eurasian Economic Union, led by Moscow, to hope for their plans to come true. For the Russians in the first place are military actions and sanctions, lifting of which is Russia’s greatest concern. And only after that come interests of its colleagues from CIS, and then under the condition that these interests will coincide with the Russian ones. But the moment a Russian military plane that got lost in the Syrian sky in combat mission is shot down by a missile and falls on someone else’s land, the fragile edifice of the so-called Russian geopolitics falls apart. And again, like once in the Soviet Union, under its political rubble will flounder Russia’s neighbors-colleagues from the CIS.

…Not for nothing the next meeting of the Council of Heads of CIS countries is scheduled for September 16, 2016. Russia hopes that by then it will manage to place all chess pieces on the political board in the right for it order.

Схожі публікації