LAST WEEK’S KEY FACTORS AND MAIN TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITUATION AROUND UKRAINE
(November 28 – December 04, 2016)
I. Major-Profile Events in the Development of the Situation around Ukraine
In the situation of Russia’s continuing its military aggression against Ukraine, very important for our State are Moscow’s action plans in foreign and domestic spheres. The main directions of these plans were determined in V. Putin’s annual Address to the Federal Assembly of Russia on 1st December, 2016, as well as in the new Concept of the Russian Federation’s Foreign Policy.
Thus, V. Putin’s Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly of Russia was intended to justify the Kremlin’s policy and to consolidate the Russian society around him by declaring “changes for better” in the development of the situation in the country and to mask its real state.
In this regard, the main points include messages frankly untrue and populist statements about: “…restoration of the positive dynamics of economic development of the country, despite the Western sanctions”; “…maintaining the stability of the Russian financial system, including strengthening of the ruble, holding the low level of inflation and the increase in the volume of foreign exchange reserves…”; “…improving the quality of health care and education in Russia”.
Besides, V. Putin expressed the Kremlin’s intention to continue to support the country’s economy (especially its high-tech industries), to intensify efforts to create new jobs, to reduce taxes, as well as to provide assistance in the development of cities and regions. Separately, V. Putin pointed out the “high level of democracy in the country” and “complete freedom of Russian media’s work” and also spoke in favor of greater involvement of NGOs in the political life of the country.
Both, the Address of the President of the Russian Federation, and the Foreign Policy Concept of Russia, have formulated and enshrined Moscow’s views on the current situation in the world, and have determined the directions of actions to implement Russia’s interests.
Thus, in typical Russian style cynical twisting of the facts, they pointed out “the accumulation of systemic problems in the Euro-Atlantic region”, which supposedly was the result of the “geopolitical expansion of NATO and the EU and their unwillingness to participate in the formation of a pan-European security system”. Besides, the USA and its allies are accused of “carrying out the policy of containing Russia and putting pressure on it and this undermines stability in the world and in the region and affects the interests of all parties”. It is the above mentioned that was called “the main reason for a serious crisis in relations between Russia and the West”. In view of the above-mentioned circumstances, Moscow “reserves the right to toughly respond to unfriendly actions”.
Proceeding from the interests of Russia, the main aims of its foreign policy are determined as follows: ensuring security, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country; strengthening Russia’s positions as of one of the most influential centers of the world; forming a Eurasian Union; creation of favorable external conditions for the sustained growth of the Russian economy; scaling the Russian media’s entering the global information space.
At the same time, in order to craft a positive image of Russia in the eyes of the international community, was expressed “Moscow’s readiness to develop mutually beneficial and friendly relations with foreign states”, including with the USA, the EU and Ukraine in compliance with Russian interests.
However, Russia’s real policy in the external sphere has maintained its aggressive anti-Ukrainian and anti-Western orientation and has been characterized by Moscow’s continuing putting pressure on Ukraine and the USA/EU, focusing on the demonstration of military force.
II. Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine
2.1. The East of Ukraine (The ATO Zone)
The main problem in resolving the situation in the Donbas remains the Putin regime’s actions to impose on Ukraine Russia’s terms of implementation of the peace plan providing for the formal return of the occupied territories into our State, while maintaining Russia’s control over them. In anticipation of changes in the United States’ attitude to Russia and Ukraine after the election of D. Trump President of the United States of America, such Moscow’s actions become more rigid and uncompromising.
Evidence of this was the meeting of Foreign Ministers of the “Normandy Four” on 29 November, 2016, in Minsk, during which Russia confirmed its claims to Ukraine on its implementation of the political part of the Minsk Agreements before the security problems have been resolved. At this, Russian Foreign Minister S. Lavrov once again denied the presence of Russian troops in the Donbas and disavowed the Russian leadership’s previous statements about the possibility of the deployment of the OSCE Police Mission in the Donbas. According to him, the issue was not considered by the Russian side. Besides, S. Lavrov accused Ukraine of violating the agreements on the withdrawal of the parties’ forces from the front line, which supposedly “is several times higher than similar violations by the DPR and LPR”.
These circumstances were the reason for the meeting of the “Normandy Four” having ended in absolutely no result in terms of coordination of the “roadmap” for implementation of the Minsk Agreements. The above-said confirms Moscow’s intention to delay the process of resolving the crisis in the Donbas until the political situation in the USA, the EU and Ukraine is favourable for Russia.
At the same time, within the framework of putting pressure on Ukraine, Russian- terrorist troops continued systematic attacks on the ATO with an average intensity of about 40-50 shelling per day. Besides, there were attempts of the enemy’s intelligence-subversive groups to break into the rears of the ATO forces, including in the areas of withdrawal of forces and means of the parties from the front line.
2.2. The Crimean Peninsula
V. Putin’s regime continues active measures to intimidate the population of the Crimea, and to internationally discredit Ukraine, accusing our State of the “aggressive actions against the Crimean Peninsula”. For example, after the failure of the theme of the “Ukrainian saboteurs in the Crimea”, Russia has tried to sharpen the situation around the Armed Forces of Ukraine’s trainings in Kherson region with launch of anti-aircraft missiles. In this context, Moscow conducted an active information campaign with allegations of “Ukraine’s intentions to apply missile attacks on the Crimea” and “Ukraine’s creation of threats to air traffic”. At this, they kept reminding of the “fact” of the alleged destruction by Ukraine during similar trainings in October 2001, of a passenger plane Tu-154 of “Siberia” airline, flight Tel Aviv — Novosibirsk during its flying over the Black Sea.
Besides, make this situation more acute, November 25, 2016, the Russian Ministry of Defense warned Ukraine that Moscow intended to adequately respond in case of threats to the security of the Crimea. In this context, they stressed the possibility of destroying Ukrainian missiles in the air and attacking their launchers.
To confirm these threats, Russians increased the degree of alert and reinforced the system of Air Defense of the RF Armed Forces in the Crimea. In particular, at the end of November 2016, S-300VM was transported to the Crimea. Besides, to the combat positions around the Crimean Peninsula were brought the ships of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation. At the same time, they intensified the air reconnaissance of the southern regions of Ukraine.
Taking into consideration the possibility of Russia’s military provocations against Ukraine and of a new armed conflict, the development of the situation around the Crimea drew NATO’s increased attention. In particular, to monitor the RF Armed Forces’ operations in the region, was used an E-3A AWACS-NATO from the Air Base Geilenkirchen in Germany and the advanced base in Romania, which carried out surveillance flights over the Black Sea.
Meanwhile Russian special services continued provocations against Ukraine. In particular, last week the Russian security services detained two people on the border with Ukraine in Rostov region, and called them “Ukrainian military servicemen who refused to take part in the ATO and sought refuge in the Russian Federation”.
However, after the arrest by the Ukrainian law enforcement agencies of the two former Ukrainian military servicemen who had gone over to the Russian side in the Crimea after its occupation, the Russian leadership is carrying out activities to cheer up the rest of the traitors. November 28, 2016, Mr. Putin signed a decree on recognizing the military ranks and documents on education of persons who had served in the Ukrainian Army and other security agencies and are now serve under contract in the Armed Forces of Russia.
2.3. Other Aspects of the Russian Federation’s Actions against Ukraine and the West
Against the background of the above-mentioned developments, the Putin regime continued its efforts to intimidate European countries by demonstrating Russia’s military capabilities and preparations. According to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, since the beginning of 2016, the military formations and units of the Western Military District of the RF Armed Forces have received more than 1.5 thousand test pieces of weapons and military equipment, including tanks and armored combat vehicles, missile and artillery systems, aircraft and helicopters.
Among the main ones were mentioned infantry fighting vehicles BMP-3, BTR-82A armored vehicles, “Tiger” vehicles, “Typhoon” armored vehicles, Su-35 fighters, Mi-28N “Night Hunter” attack helicopters, Mi-35 “Crocodile”, Mi-8AMTSh “Terminator” transport-attack helicopters, and also UAVs. In turn, in 2016, the “Almaz-Antey” concern of aerospace defense has supplied the troops with five regimental anti-aircraft missile systems S-400 “Triumph”, as well as with the air defense system of medium-range “Buk-M2” and “Buk-M3” and of short range — “Tor-M2”.
Along with this, the Aerospace forces (VKS) of the RF Armed Forces started testing the new hypersonic missiles for long-range aircraft (strategic) bombers. According to the Russian side, the missile has a maximum speed in excess of 5-6 times the speed of sound, and is able to overcome anti-missile system and air defense. The development of the missile is carried out within the framework of the ambitious program of creating hypersonic vehicles for the VKS, Strategic Nuclear Forces and the Navy. In particular, the program includes the development of the “Tsirkon” anti-ship missile for arming submarines and heavy missile cruisers.
Against this background, Russia has actually confirmed its policy of making the split between Ukraine and Poland. Thus, the Russian State Duma adopted a resolution condemning the joint Declaration of Remembrance and Solidarity, adopted by the Parliaments of Ukraine and Poland. The State Duma of the Russian Federation calls the document “the attempts of politicians of Ukraine and Poland to rewrite the history of World War II”. According to the Russian side, “…this way Ukraine and Poland not only cause irreparable damage to relations with Russia, but also undermine the inviolability of their own borders”.
At the same time, Russia’s intentions were expressed as of the “state-successor of the USSR, the winner in the Second World War, to prevent the revision of the conclusions of the Nuremberg Tribunal and the post-war world order, the guarantor of which is Russia”. Despite the blatant cynicism of such a statement in the situation of Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine, the Russian State Duma called on the USA and the UK (as allies in World War II) to support Russia’s position. Thus, in addition to undermining the unity of Ukraine and Poland, Moscow has made an attempt to establish a ground for joint the United States and Britain putting pressure on our State also in the issue of the results of the Second World War.
III. Ukraine, International Organizations and Leading Western Countries
3.1. International Organizations
The European Union. November 30, 2016, the European Commission announced the project of creation of the European Defence Fund in the amount of 5 billion Euros for the joint development, production and procurement of military equipment. The project was presented as part of the new EU Global Strategy Implementation Plan on Security and Defence, adopted last week.
At the same time, the head of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker reiterated his position on the need to strengthen the sanctions against Russia in connection with the continuation of the armed conflict in the Donbas. According to him, if Russia sees the possibility of easing the sanctions policy by the EU, it will inevitably use it as a “trump card” in its aggressive actions.
However, a further delay in the process of addressing the issue of simplification of visa regime between the EU and our State is not good for Ukraine. Thus, November 29, 2016, the European Parliament and the EU Council failed to reach agreement on the suspension of such a regime in case of a crisis situation and once again postponed its consideration.
3.2. Leading Western Countries
The US Congress demonstrates its consolidated positions with regard to Europe, Ukraine and Russia. Thus, within the framework of the adoption of the country’s defense budget for the next financial year, the House of Representatives of the US Congress approved the allocation of 3.42 billion US dollars to the Pentagon to support security in Europe and contain Russia. At this, a ban was imposed on financing any projects of military cooperation between the USA and Russia (until Moscow fulfills the Minsk Agreements, de-occupies Ukraine and stops its aggression that threatens the security of Ukraine and NATO countries), and the activities that can contribute to the recognition of Russia’s sovereignty over the Crimea. Besides, 350 million US dollars are planned to be allocated for provision of assistance to Ukraine in the military sphere. The decision on the use of these funds will take the US President personally, without any additional conditions.
Besides, the US Congress’ House of Representatives has passed the bill on combating Russia’s hidden (secret) influence on the governments and societies of other countries. The draft law provides for the establishment of a special inter-ministerial Committee with the task of coordinating the activities of the US intelligence in this sphere. In particular, such activities are going to be focused on exposing Moscow’s actions for spreading false information and using the agents of influence and methods of corruption for promotion of Russia’s interests.
Within the framework of the bill on the financing of the US intelligence services for 2017, were also introduced restrictions on the movement of Russian diplomats in the United States at a distance of not more than 40 km from the Russian Embassy in Washington or consulates in other cities.
The USA and EU’s actions against Russia are supported by most of the leading Western countries. Last week, Canada joined the sanctions against the “deputies” of the State Duma of the RF from the Crimea. The UK Prime Minister T. Mae and head of the Government of Poland B. Szydlo spoke in favor of strengthening the sanctions against Russia.
In fact, the German Parliament also took a consolidated position on the Russian issue. Continuation of the EU’s sanctions policy towards Russia was supported also by the head of the Bundestag Committee for Foreign Affairs N. Rettgen, the faction of the ruling bloc of the Christian Social and Christian Democratic Union led by Angela Merkel, and representatives of the opposition bloc “Soyuz-90”/“The Green”.
In particular, in this regard, the CDU/CSU faction released a special statement regarding Russia’s ongoing aggression against Eastern Europe, which poses a threat to the whole Western world. In this regard, there is need to strengthen the defense within the framework of NATO, to strengthen the intelligence, as well as to deepen military technical cooperation of Western countries.
In turn, within the framework of NATO’s joint efforts to increase the Alliance’s defense capabilities in the East, countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the Baltic States are stepping up measures to strengthen their armed forces.
Thus, Poland‘s Ministry of National Defence has decided to purchase from the USA 70 AGM-158 JASSM “air-to-ground” tactical cruise missiles, and equipment for their operation and use worth about 200 million US dollars. The US Department of State has already given permission to sell these missiles to Poland.
In November 2016, Romania received the first six F-16 fighters of the American make, which were in service in Portugal. The agreement worth 628 million US dollars was concluded in 2013 and provides for supply Romania with 12 aircraft. Three of them will be delivered by the end of 2016, and the rest — in 2017. Besides, the Romanian Ministry of Defence is planning to conclude a contract to purchase armored vehicles from the German company “Rheinmetall Defence” to replace the 1.5 thousand Soviet BTR-70.
Lithuania has a similar intention. It entered into an agreement with Germany for the purchase of 168 armored personnel carriers M577 of German production. The agreement is worth 1.6 million Euros. Earlier, Lithuania already bought from Germany 21 PzH2000 self-propelled howitzers, 88 Boxer armored vehicles and 340 trucks of Daimler production.
IV. Other Important Trends and Developments that Affect Ukraine’s National Interests
The Eurasian Economic Union. Despite the EurAsEC’s priority importance for Russia, the situation in the Organization is complex and characterized by the persistence of disagreements between its members. Evidence of this is the emergence of the oil shortage problem in Kazakhstan’s market in November this year. According to Kazakhstan’s leadership, the reason for this is decrease in the volume of oil supplies from Russia, which satisfies 30 % of the country’s needs. Commenting on this situation, the RF Ministry of Energy refers to the drop in gasoline supplies from Belarus, which processes Russian oil. In turn, Belarus accuses Moscow of manipulating the issue of supply of oil to Belarusian refineries to put pressure on Minsk in the political and economic spheres. With this in mind, Belarus intensifies measures to find alternative sources of oil and has already reached the relevant agreements with Azerbaijan (in October of this year, Azerbaijan has delivered to Belarus 85 thousand tons of oil).
CSTO. Russia has quite contradictory relations also with its partners in the CSTO. November 30, 2016, as part of deepening military cooperation between Russia and Armenia, they signed an agreement on establishing the joint forces of the two countries consisting of the 102nd base of the RF Armed Forces and the Armenian Armed Forces. At the same time, President of Kyrgyzstan A. Atambayev called for the withdrawal of Russian military bases from the territory of the country after the expiration of the respective contract. He also raised the question of the revision of the signed in 2009 agreement on the reduction of the period from 49 to 15 years. According to A. Atambayev, Kyrgyzstan should ensure its security on its own.
Russia-Turkey. Against the background of Moscow’s declarations on Russia’s being interested in building a constructive relationship with Turkey, the Putin regime shows disdain for Ankara and continues to exert pressure on it. Thus, on 29 November 2016, the Russian President’s Press Secretary D. Peskov expressed his dissatisfaction with Turkey’s President R. Erdogan’s statement about the aims of the “Shield of the Euphrates” operation (held by Turkey’s Armed Forces and the Air Force of the international Coalition in Syria), among which he mentioned “the overthrow of B. Assad’s regime”. According to D. Peskov, the above-mentioned completely contradicts Russia’s position on Syria and the previous statements made by R. Erdogan, and needs his explanations. At the same time, D. Peskov called the Russian troops in Syria “…the only foreign troops which are in the country on a legitimate basis, under the agreement with Syria’s legal government”. This once again confirmed the dual nature of the Kremlin’s policy, seeking its own interests in its relations with other states, and demonstrated deep disagreements between Russia and Turkey on the Syrian issue.
V. Main Trends in the Development of the Situation around Ukraine in the Future
5.1. Key Events and Trends that Will Be Most Important for Ukraine
For the immediate future the most important for the interests of Ukraine will be the EU’s decision on the future orientation of the policy of sanctions against Russia. Tentatively, this issue will be considered in mid-December of this year before the inauguration of the new President of the United States D. Trump. The European Union’s maintaining sanctions against Russia will be fundamentally important in terms of further undermining the Russian economy and bringing it to a critical state, demonstrating the unity of the EU, and the influence on the USA’s attitude to Moscow.
Taking into consideration the above-mentioned differences between the EU member states, it is necessary to expect the next surge of controversy in the European Union around the entire complex of problems associated with Russia’s armed aggression against Ukraine. These differences will be actively supported and used by Moscow to disrupt the possibility of adopting the EU’s consolidated decision on prolongation of sanctions against Russia. At the same time, V. Putin’s regime will act according to the methods already mastered, including the diplomatic work with the leaders of the EU member states, using the Russian lobby in the European Union, bribing some politicians and representatives of business circles, information campaign of anti-sanctions orientation.
Besides, Russia will bring to a new level the actions to intimidate Ukraine and its Western allies by demonstrating the threat of a “large-scale war” in Europe. The manifestations of this are Moscow’s continuous build-up of attack forces and weapons on the Western strategic direction, and threats to attack Ukraine (including the example of the recent missile tests conducted by the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Kherson region).
Intensification of Russia’s military activities on the Ukrainian and European directions is possible also within the framework of the beginning (December 1, 2016) of the new training year in the Russian Federation’s Armed Forces. In particular, as of today, the plans have been announced for the exercises of the 1st Tank Army of the Western Military District of the RF Armed Forces in the new contingent (two new Regiments formed as part of the 4th Guards Kantemir Tank Division and the 2nd Guards Taman Motorized Rifle Division).
5.2. Prospects for the Development of Events in the Conflict Zones of Ukraine
Russia’s above-mentioned policy will have a direct impact on the development of the situation around the conflict zones on the territory of Ukraine. Thus, within the framework of pressure on Ukraine and its Western partners, Russia, with a high probability will activate the armed conflict in the Donbas. Besides, Moscow will continue the strategy of delaying the time of adoption of the “road map” for implementation of the Minsk Agreements, which will be accompanied by imposing on Ukraine of the Russian approaches to their implementation. Due to this, further meetings in the “Normandy Format” and meetings of the Trilateral Contact Group in Minsk will have no real results.
Against this background, Russia will continue its provocative actions in the Crimea. In particular, Moscow’s reaction to the Armed Forces of Ukraine’s missile tests in Kherson region showed the possibility of Russia’s transition from occasional actions of intelligence services to larger-scale provocations, including missile attacks on settlements and military facilities in the Crimean Peninsula, of which Ukraine will be accused. Such accusations will be used by the Putin regime to create Ukraine’s negative image in the eyes of the West, and as a pretext for a possible expansion of the scope of Russia’s armed aggression against our country.
5.3. Other Important Events that Will Have an Impact on Ukraine’s Interests and Security
The meeting of the European Council on the 15th and 16th December, 2016 in Brussels, is going to consider the ratification by the Netherlands of the Agreement on Ukraine’s Association with the EU, and to discuss Russia’s actions against our country. Based on the results of the discussion of these issues, decisions can be taken on how to reach a compromise with the Netherlands on the issue of Ukraine, and on determining further directions of containing V. Putin’s regime.