For today in the context of Ukraine’s membership in the energy community, bringing the Ukrainian natural gas market to European standards is an urgent task. The key question in this context is that of reforming the NAC “Naftogas of Ukraine”.
The EU energy law’s norms for vertical integrated structures demand division according to the kinds of activity. But there realization within the framework of the second energy packet was very complicated, as large vertically and horizontally integrated operators were putting us a resistance to the division. In 2008 the European Parliament declined the offers of the European commission as to the compulsory division, and later, together with the Council of Ministers, it adopted a compromised approach, which entered the third energy packet. The latter suggests a few versions of the division, which can use flexible approaches, among them the following ones were determined:
- Compulsory division of the ownership of vertically integrated holdings: energy companies should sell their transmission nets to an independent operator and cant have a control packet in it;
- Vertically integrated companies may remain owners of transmission networks. But in this case, a network’s management should be exercised by an “independent system operator”, ISO. The right to make decisions on commercial and investment questions belongs to ISO, which is appointed by the national government after such a decision has been approved by the Euro-Commission;
- Like in the case of ISO, the vertically integrated corporations will remain, but their activity will be controlled by a specially established “supervising body”, while the network’s management will be exercised by a separate organization body- an independent daughter company, “independent transmission operator”, ITO.
In this version the mother company can preserve its right to make commercial and investment decisions, but it will have to establish a certain framework in order to be able to guarantee the independence of the transmission’s network by:
- establishment of a supervising council consisting of the company’s representatives, independent share-holders and the ISO’s representatives;
- the council’s approval of the coordinated program, which establishes certain measures for preventing the deliverers’ discrimination while using the network from the side of ITO;
- the council’s appointment of a responsible employee with certain powers in order to ensure non-discriminative conditions;
- introduction of the conditions of “quarantine” for the representatives of the company managers during the transfer between the delivery companies and the delivery operator (before a manager from a vertically integrated company gets a job in the operator-company, he goes under the quarantine for 3 years; managers of operator-companies wont be able to get a job in a vertically integrated company without a 4 year quarantine).
No doubt, for the NAC “Naftogas of Ukraine” the most acceptable is the third (compromise) version. In this case the Company is allowed to have transmission assets on its balance, which will be regarded to as financial ones, and “Ukrnaftogas” can stay in its structure.
But in this case a number of additional conditions will be put forward concerning the Company’s activity, aiming at making the control of these asserts impossible (for example, the regulators will be able to control the prohibition of passing over confidential information, concerning the gas deliverer from ITO to the other part of the company, the proper distribution of expanses between the ITO and the unregulated part of the business). Also common subunits, like a juridical, will be forbidden.
The ITO version was included under the pressure of the energy concerns of Europe (E.on, RWE, GDF, and Suez).
Thus, the main question of liberal reforms in Ukraine is the division of the NAC “Naftogas of Ukraine”. But to settle it, the following should be mentioned.
Liquidation of the NAC “Naftogas of Ukraine” monopoly and its daughter structures at the market of industrial gas consumers without special preparation work on creating really competing conditions, can give the results not as positive as the expected ones. The reason is that lately up to 90 % of the gas which is being sold to the industrial consumers at the domestic market is of Russian origin. That is why after the liberalization of the market, delivery companies will be realizing the same “Gazprom’s gas, and the price competition will take place only in the part of the cost of the services. This, in the first rate, concerns the “settling the questions” of the access to the resource, pipelines and consumers.
So, the liquidation of the NAC “Naftogas of Ukraine” monopoly at the domestic market of industrial consumers will lead to the reproduction of the situation of the middle of 1990s, when the natural gas market was controlled by several structures, which actually were regional monopolists.
Political and economic realities in Ukraine are not favorable, for singling out the key structures of “Naftogaz”. In particular, singling out of “Ukrtransgaz” will most possibly lead to the change of the Ukrainian GTS’s status, which will be realized either according to the Belarusian scenario or in the framework of the two-sided consortium. The prospects of the creation of the two-sided consortium are very doubtful, as the third energy packet, which Ukraine, as an energy community’s member will be introducing later, will create obstacles on its way of participation in the project of European gas companies. Singling out and further privatization of gas producing companies of “Naftogaz”, will annihilate “social” gas, and the population will have to buy it at the highest in Europe prices.
So at the present moment it is reasonable to reform the NAC “Naftogaz of Ukraine” company by the ITO scheme, having preserved the vertically integrated structure.
The current structure of the NAC “Naftogaz of Ukraine” is based on the division by the kinds of activity. But in the work of the Company there are a number of problems which can be defined as inconsistent with the EU’s energy Law. These questions are connected with the Company’s influence on making some decisions by its daughter companies and industries, uniting higher posts in the Company and in its daughter structures, ensuring a proper control of the non-discriminating behavior of the operators at certain sectors of the gas market, etc.
In principle, the mentioned above problems can be removed quite easily within the framework of the ITO’s scheme. At this stage of the reforming, preserving the whole vertically integrated structure of the NAC “Naftogaz of Ukraine” will be up to the world economic realities, when large companies, trying to reduce constant expanses, carry out absorption and/or amalgamation of smaller companies and thus make the structures larger. At this the Company will have positive results for the following spheres of its activity:
Carrying out a common branch and corporate policy, for example, regarding the strategy of its development and reformation.
- Accumulation of money for carrying out large scale projects and critical tasks, for instance, payments for the consumed Russian gas in the situation of the economic crisis.
- Participation in serious international projects, because the NAC “Naftogaz of Ukraine”, as a vertically integrated company will have better opportunities for capitalization and more predictable financial streams, which will positively influence on the improvement of the credit rating.
- Optimization of transfer price formation and limitation of financial risks.
- Relations with the Company’s creditors, who may negatively accept the attempts to single out from the NAC “Naftogaz” the most liquid businesses.
If the vertically integrated structure of the Company is preserved, it will be necessary to revise the system of the relations and terms of reference between the Company and its daughter companies in the context of optimization of the finance – economic activity and management-control functions in order to keep the norms of the European Law and to introduce the European management culture.
At such an approach, a partial privatization of the Company with the realization of IPO at one of European grounds looks advisable. Also as a version of privatization, it is possible to create a so-called “people’s company” with selling small packets of shares to the population or selling minority interests (10-20 %) to strategic investors. Privatization will allow drawing in money for renovation, to increase market capitalization, to improve structures of the joint stock and credit rating, and to get acquainted with the European corporate culture.
Reformation of the Ukraine’s gas market according to the described above scenario has to be accompanied by the creation of technological abilities for the gas coming from alternative sources. After the diversification of the sources of gas production and integration into European markets, it will be possible to carry out a deeper division. Strengthening of the market regulator’s independence, ensuring a free access to the gas transmission networks can and must be done right now. The proper completion of the liberal market reforms in the gas sphere may need up to 5 to 7 years.
It has to be mentioned, that at the present moment there exist many political motives for reforming the NAC “Naftogaz of Ukraine” in other ways, like through its complete division. But carrying this out without taking into consideration all the said above, it can lead to fragmentation of the gas market of Ukraine, and under certain circumstances- to its absolute destruction.
Another problem of reforming the gas market is the work of gas distributing businesses, so called “oblgases”. They are key structures for the domestic market as they secure gas transmission to the consumers via regional networks, and controlling billing and telemetric system, they, in fact, form regional balances.
It is these businesses that can stand in the way of the free access to the networks in the process of liberal reforms, as apart from distributing gas they also sell it. That is why the “oblgases” should be divided by the types of activity. It is also necessary to properly regulate the juridical grounds of the exploitation of the regional gas networks, most of which belong to the state. It is a pity, that neither lease-hold which is a common practice now, nor the suggested by the Government placing them under authority of economic organizations, nor other forms of transfer do not allow to properly settle all the problems which emerge at this in particular, those concerning the indivisibility of wholesome property complexes, alienation and writing off a property, drawing in invests and many others. It is obvious such an important question deserves a separate Law for its regulation.
Without a proper reformation of “oblgases”, their concentration in the hands of one structure can become a key for the monopole control of the gas market, especially if this structure will be “Gazprom”.
To sum up all the said above, it has to be pointed out that to properly reform the Ukrainian gas market alone, separately from the market of other energy carriers, is impossible. For example, a considerable part of gas problems are in the sphere of the teplocomunenergo businesses, which are incorrigible defaulters for gas, and the reforms of the electric energy market are held back by the gas and coal problems. All these questions should be perfected in the framework of a document, which has to be based on the energy strategy.
