Bohdan Sokolovskyi
Against the background of hot news from Russia about possible termination of diplomatic relations, from the Crimea and Donbas about the war, about e-declaration, etc., for the most part the media did not pay attention to the fact that Russia has lately reduced the pressure of transit gas in the Ukrainian gas transportation system by more than 10 %.
Remember how in 2008–2009 highly experienced gas producers argued that for the Ukrainian gas transportation system and our state as a whole, this situation is very undesirable and even dangerous. In particular, they insisted that inadmissibility of such a situation should be clearly written in the transit contract. And the fact of such a gas pressure reduction at the entrance is the basis for allegations of serious deviations from the transit contract with the relevant conclusions up to an appeal to the court and breaking the contract. It is unlikely that something has radically changed since then. Now gas pressure reduction is a fact, but no measures towards the Russian Federation have been taken. Why? Here another question arises: in the past someone deliberately misinformed the head of the state, and this is happening again, isn’t it?
Lately, the focus is on the analysis of the issue of breaking/not breaking diplomatic relations between Ukraine and the Russian Federation and other bilateral relations are not taken into consideration. In this connection it is appropriate to note that whether the diplomatic relations between Ukraine and the Russian Federation (as well as cultural, economic, scientific, etc.) will be broken or not — is a debatable question. We have opponents and supporters of this. One thing is clear, — any Ukrainian-Russian cooperation is limited or even non-existent, and diplomatic relations cannot be subject to public discussion. Now the Ukrainian-Russian diplomatic relations, de facto, are limited and inefficient. The consular relations can also hardly be called efficient, especially given examples with letting our consular officials to the Ukrainians in Russian prisons. Against this background, many people for some reason confuse diplomatic and consular relations. In this context, it should be pointed out that the termination of one kind of relations does not necessarily mean a break of others, and service of Ukrainian citizens — is purely consular’s work, not that of the embassy. In particular, Georgia clearly demonstrated this in 2008, having broken diplomatic relations with Russia, while not breaking consular relations. Besides, since 2008 to the present time, Georgia has shown that during the occupation of the country bilateral diplomatic relations with the help of a third party can be more effective than direct bilateral relations.
But in the end there is a situation, which we should use to achieve strategic and tactical interests — to do a specific job. We are talking about the gas industry. Considering the entire complex of Ukrainian-Russian relations today, diplomatic ones included, one can’t help noticing the violations, which can be dangerous for our state or its components. And the above-mentioned decrease in the inlet pressure in the Ukrainian gas transportation system is just such a breach. So, the decrease in pressure is the basis for revising the conditions of the transit of Russian gas to Europe through the territory of Ukraine, especially in the period of limitation in relations in other spheres.
From the beginning to the present day Western buyers of gas (gas traders) have been receiving gas from Russia on the western border of Ukraine. Gas metering stations (GMS), accounting it, are situated there. With regard to the accounting of Russian gas supplied to Ukraine in the east of our border, we get all the data, as a rule, from the Russians. Certified GMS are located on Russian territory. There are Ukrainian observers there who, as a rule, have been living there for decades, and they, de facto, already perceive Russian statehood better than the Ukrainian one. Western companies signed contracts with the Russian side. And the latter signed a contract with Ukraine. Under the contract with the Russian side, we must ensure transit through our territory. Obviously, it is meant under conditions of peaceful relations between Ukraine and Russia. But now, when the two countries are actually at war, and quite serious “men” began to talk about breaking diplomatic relations, the transit guarantees are formal.
So, Western buyers of Russian gas should be interested in Ukraine’s officially guaranteeing the transit of Russian gas to Europe. That is, they should be interested in revising the contract on transit of Russian gas through the territory of Ukraine: to abandon the Russian contracts regarding gas transit through Ukraine and to sign a contract with the Ukrainian side. It is obvious that we have to offer these companies our transit conditions that fully conform to national interests and European practice, tariffs and transit guarantees included. We are talking about moving the transfer of Russian gas to Europeans from the western border of Ukraine to the eastern one. Obviously, for this it is necessary to organize their registration. This means that the condition of revising the transit contract is the availability of certified GMS on the eastern border of Ukraine, that is, on the Ukrainian territory.
Once, in 2009, the European Commission was ready to lend Ukraine money for equipping GMS in the East. It seems up to half a billion US dollars for 6 GMS for registration of Russian gas supplied to Ukraine. Clearly, now that figure may be reduced, especially after optimizing the number of gas entry points, given its real volumes. In a word, there is a subject for effective negotiations with Russia and we should take advantage of it.
